> Sorry, but why do *you* chose the logo? I thought that Debian is a team
> and not one person. There should be an election.
I disagree. Let's have an election about whether we need an election.
Golly, this could be fun ;)
--
Mark Shuttleworth
Thawte Consulting
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS M
Am 01.12.97 schrieb bruce # va.debian.org ...
Moin Bruce!
BP> We've been having a logo contest for a long time. It failed to generate
BP> a consensus on a logo for the project. It got to the point where people
What's wrong with the logo on www.debian.org?
BP> I chose this logo because it is a s
From: Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Good choice. You forgot to give some credit to the artist (Simon?)
That's why. All I have is "Simon?".
> Do you think SPI should trademark it?
Yes, definitely, right away. It turns out that it is absurdly easy to
file for a trademark, I did the "debian" one
On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > The logo I chose is
> >
> > http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-logo/profile/si02.html
>
> Good choice. You forgot to give some credit to the artist (Simon?) though.
>
> Do you think SPI should trademark it? What sort of licensing
> The logo I chose is
>
> http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/debian-logo/profile/si02.html
Good choice. You forgot to give some credit to the artist (Simon?) though.
Do you think SPI should trademark it? What sort of licensing do you think
would be best? What does the original
We've been having a logo contest for a long time. It failed to generate
a consensus on a logo for the project. It got to the point where people
were clamoring for me to hire a commercial artist and get the job done.
I went over the candidates in the logo contest, and found one that was
probably as
6 matches
Mail list logo
