On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:49 +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> >If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
> >The answer you might give is, "Oh! Send am email to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
[snip]
I filed bug #353260 with a patch to do
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing
> explanation as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
Because most "standard" BTSes suck?
> If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interfa
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:19:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
>> What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an empty
>> email to $email.'' to make more explicit that they
>> don't need to fill anything out?
>
>There are a whole host
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:48:55AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> > This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
>
> > +print "mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Subscribe to this
> > bug.
>
> What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:48:55AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
> +print "mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Subscribe to this bug.
What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an empty
email to $email.'' to make more explicit that they
don'
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.4.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
>The answer you might give is, "Oh! Send am email to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
This may be a simple way to ad
On Jul 07, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
> as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
Because no such a thing exists, for a start. HTH.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
> as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
There is a whole host of reasons. Some I can think of offhand:
- All other known alternatives have a numb
Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
> as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
I guess most "standard BTSses" can't be easily manipulated by E-Mail,
while ours can.
> If I need to subscribe to a bug
la, 2006-07-08 kello 01:02 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf kirjoitti:
> If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
> The answer you might give is, "Oh! Send am email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> Can't we have an interface to allow subscribing to a bug through the web
> interface just l
Hi,
Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
The answer you might give is, "Oh! Send am email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can't we have an interface to allow su
11 matches
Mail list logo
