On Apr 26, Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it more confusing to have the package name differ by one letter from
> the only binary in it, or is it more confusing for the package to be
> named via a different convention than similar applications? Any input is
> appreciated.
Probably it
It has been suggested to me that I get some input from the list on the
naming of my recently uploaded packages for dkim-milter and dk-milter.
I thought I had opened an ITP for this purpose, but it turns out I had
not; hence this message.
The core issue: Upstream calls the *packages* dkim-milter an
2 matches
Mail list logo
