Le Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 01:26:55PM -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Riku Voipio wrote:
> > I think the short term solution to this dilemma is to compile a list
> > of attributions needed to be included in advertizment material.
> > Also a list should be compiled attributions needed n documentation
> >
Riku Voipio wrote:
> I think the short term solution to this dilemma is to compile a list
> of attributions needed to be included in advertizment material.
> Also a list should be compiled attributions needed n documentation
> (such as libjpeg's). Obviously most distributors/boob writers will
> not
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:34:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I think that it is a bit frivolous to distribute software with
> advertisment clause in main and not properly warning the redistributors,
I think the short term solution to this dilemma is to compile a list
of attributions needed to
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [You didn't honor my M-F-T so I guess this will continue to go to both
> lists.]
Indeed.
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:29:29PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The version in /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD is very specifically the
>> UCB version,
> A m
[You didn't honor my M-F-T so I guess this will continue to go to both
lists.]
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:29:29PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I believe your reasoning is faulty, because it is based on incomplete
> > information. There was more
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe your reasoning is faulty, because it is based on incomplete
> information. There was more than one "BSD" license in use well before
> USB's Office of Technology Licensing withdrew the 4-clause version.
[snip]
While this is very interestin
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:27:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>> Am I missing something?
> This ?
> http://web.archive.org/web/19990210065944/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
> http://web.archive.org/web/20001205083200/http://www.debian.org/m
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:27:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, I could have sworn that the DFSG predated the Constitution and hence
> predated the existence of the three-clause BSD license. UCB dropped the
> advertising clause in July of 1999 and the D
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 10:27:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> Am I missing something?
This ?
http://web.archive.org/web/19990210065944/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
http://web.archive.org/web/20001205083200/http://www.debian.org/misc/bsd.license
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The 4-clause BSD license is not one that we list as an acceptable
> license.
>
> DFSG http://www.debian.org/social_contract> §10:
>
> 10. Example Licenses
>
> The GPL, BSD, and Artistic licenses are examples of licenses that
> we consider fre
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think it's horribly credible that including software covered
> by the 4-clause BSD license in Debian violates the principle of
> least surprise when we specifically list it as one of our acceptable
> licenses in the DFSG.
The 4-clause BSD license
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think that it is a bit frivolous to distribute software with
> advertisment clause in main and not properly warning the redistributors,
> who are the most likely persons to infringe the clause. We should
> remeber that for other aspects of licencing a
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:44:38PM -0800, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This example is maybe a bit artificial, but the point is that with such
> > licences in main, redistributors who use advertisement should in theory
> > read all the copyright files t
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This example is maybe a bit artificial, but the point is that with such
> licences in main, redistributors who use advertisement should in theory
> read all the copyright files to check who to acknowledge. For this
> reason, I wouldn't recommend to incl
Le Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:01PM +0100, Jean Parpaillon a écrit :
>
> 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> software must display the following acknowledgement:
> This produ
15 matches
Mail list logo
