On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:54:37AM -0600 , Steve Langasek wrote:
> While a 2.0 kernel may not /run/ with a given glibc, I'm puzzled as to how
kernel doesn't care what you have under it. and newer glibc's should work OK
even with an older one.
Petr Cech
--
Debian G
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:33:26PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:28:25AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
> > > Right, good point. In fact I did use gcc272 for the actual compile. But
> > > neither gcc272 or gcc 2.95.3 compi
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:33:26PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:28:25AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
> > Right, good point. In fact I did use gcc272 for the actual compile. But
> > neither gcc272 or gcc 2.95.3 compiled mkdep.c properly. Hmm, I wonder if
>
> hmm. I wonde
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:28:25AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
> Right, good point. In fact I did use gcc272 for the actual compile. But
> neither gcc272 or gcc 2.95.3 compiled mkdep.c properly. Hmm, I wonder if
hmm. I wonder how could we compile it in the first place, given there was no
othe
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:22:22PM +0100, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:08:22AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
> > Anyway, this might help others who need to compile old kernels, and
> > hopefully the problem will be fixed by gcc 2.95.3 final.
>
> 2.0.38 will probably not compile wi
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:08:22AM -0500 , Chris L. Mason wrote:
> Anyway, this might help others who need to compile old kernels, and
> hopefully the problem will be fixed by gcc 2.95.3 final.
2.0.38 will probably not compile with gcc > 2.7.2.3 very well. You might
want to try gcc272
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
>
> Just did it on a Potato box a week ago, no problems whatsoever. Thought
> you might wish to know.
>
Okay, the problem seems to be with how mkdep is being compiled. I managed
to get the kernel to compile by copying the mkdep.c
> "Chris" == Chris L Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> Hi Stefan,
Chris> Unfortunately, no, I'm still having trouble. :( I might
Chris> wind up installing a fresh potato system on another
Chris> partition to see if it works in potato or not. If not, I
Chris> guess
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:08:17PM +0100, Stefan Frank wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> incidentally i tried to do the same yesterday.
> I got the same error message as you, but didn't bother to try to fix it.
> Maybe you need an older version of make?
>
> If you manage to get this kernel working, would
Hi,
I am running the latest sid and I'm trying to compile a custom 2.0.38
kernel for use with smalllinux on an ancient PS/2 386 with 4 megs of RAM.
(The default won't do because it doesn't have support for ESDI drives.)
Anyway, I'm running into a problem. I can't seem to run a make or even
make
10 matches
Mail list logo
