On Tuesday 26 September 2006 08:11, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> rootskel only creates the symlink from /lib64 to /lib which is required
> to run dynamically linked binaries. It does _not_ create the symlink
> from /usr/lib64 to /usr/lib.
Sorry, my mistake. Missed the /usr/ bit :-(
pgpZmrpeO4K3F.pgp
Hello Frans,
Frans Pop wrote:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > The proposed glibc patch will break the installer. The installer does
> > not have the symlink from /usr/lib64 to /usr/lib. (This is not by
> > accident. It has been decided following some discussion.)
>
> The symlink currently is there a
Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On 06-Sep-23 02:50, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> FHS says that 64bit libraries on amd64 go to [/usr]/lib64. All non
>> Debian distributions follow that line.
>
> Gentoo uses basically the same setup as Debian, i.e. it installs 64-bit
> li
On Monday 25 September 2006 09:39, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> The proposed glibc patch will break the installer. The installer does
> not have the symlink from /usr/lib64 to /usr/lib. (This is not by
> accident. It has been decided following some discussion.)
The symlink currently is there actually:
Hello,
On 06-Sep-23 02:50, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> FHS says that 64bit libraries on amd64 go to [/usr]/lib64. All non
> Debian distributions follow that line.
Gentoo uses basically the same setup as Debian, i.e. it installs 64-bit
libraries in /usr/lib and it has a symlink from /usr/lib64
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:05:23PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 05:40:42PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > So what you seem to say is: If you copy the libc6 or static libraries
> > between distributions you deserve to fail. Thats fine if you say it
> > straight o
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 05:40:42PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> So what you seem to say is: If you copy the libc6 or static libraries
> between distributions you deserve to fail. Thats fine if you say it
> straight out.
That's what I was trying to do!
> Does the same apply to libX11. Or c
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:50:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> But running Debian binaries on other distribut
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:50:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> But running Debian binaries on other distributions remains a
> >> problem. For example static binar
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:50:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> But running Debian binaries on other distributions remains a
>> problem. For example static binaries that use libnss* plugins will
>> fail to find those plugins on other systems
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 02:50:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> But running Debian binaries on other distributions remains a
> problem. For example static binaries that use libnss* plugins will
> fail to find those plugins on other systems. Copying the debian libc6
> to your ~/lib/ dir on a
Dear release team and DDs,
I submitted a trivial patch for glibc in bug#387446 to increase the
compatibility between debian amd64 and other distributions. The
maintainer has reassign this to 'general' saying:
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually there is not
12 matches
Mail list logo
