Re: Changelog not signed by "human"

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 07:56:31PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: >> screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low >>* Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes. >>* Rebuild to fix a bug

Re: Changelog not signed by "human"

Hello, On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:02:35PM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > I could make no sense out of the second line of the changelog > > entry. "[The] bug [...] causes screen to switch" seems to be an > > incomplete sentence. I would have like

Re: Changelog not signed by "human"

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:02:35PM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > > uploads are signed and that I am just being paranoid! > > Since the buildd host generates the changelo

Re: Changelog not signed by "human"

Hello, On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > > uploads are signed and that I am just being paranoid! > > Since the buildd host generates the changelog entry, it's only natural > that it's also the buildd host which is

Re: Changelog not signed by "human"

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:04AM -0700, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote: > Hello, > > On updating my system today I obtained a version of "screen" which > was a binary-only upload which contained the following changelog > entry: > > screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Bi

Changelog not signed by "human"

Hello, On updating my system today I obtained a version of "screen" which was a binary-only upload which contained the following changelog entry: screen (4.0.3-0.3+b1) unstable; urgency=low * Binary-only non-maintainer upload for i386; no source changes. * Rebuild to