On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:12:01 +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
> > There is always the option of either recruiting one of those
> > disappointed users to maintain the package, or doing it yourself.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion -- but I'm already spending all of my
> proverbial Copious Free Time
Hi there!
Juliusz, it is better to point your question to the *maintainer* of the
package, not to debian-devel@ (which is not a mandatory mailing list for
all the maintainers). Adding the Debian Common Lisp team to the loop.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:25:19 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> It seems that
* Andrey Rahmatullin [2011-01-25 23:36 +0500]:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
> > Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
> > is the suggested replacem
> There is always the option of either recruiting one of those
> disappointed users to maintain the package, or doing it yourself.
Thanks for the suggestion -- but I'm already spending all of my
proverbial Copious Free Time on upstream work.
> It seems a shame to lose a bug-free package when you
Hi Juliusz,
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:09:43 +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
> Thanks to both of you -- I've forwarded your messages to my (soon-to-be
> former, sigh) users.
There is always the option of either recruiting one of those disappointed
users to maintain the package, or doing it yoursel
On 01/25/2011 03:09 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Thanks to both of you -- I've forwarded your messages to my (soon-to-be
> former, sigh) users.
Minus the false hits from my search, I hope? My main point was to
illustrate debtags is a nice tool for finding related packages (some
time I'll try to
Thanks to both of you -- I've forwarded your messages to my (soon-to-be
former, sigh) users.
--Juliusz
pgpdCt7J6BkEQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 01/25/2011 02:36 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
>> Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
>> is the suggested replacem
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:14:39PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
> Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
> is the suggested replacement. What shall I answer?
See http://bugs.debian.org/c
Hi,
I'm upstream for Cedilla [1,2], which has been orphaned and removed from
Sid. I'm receiving e-mail from Debian users of Cedilla, asking me what
is the suggested replacement. What shall I answer?
--Juliusz
[1] http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/cedilla/
[2] http://packages.debian.org/l
10 matches
Mail list logo
