Re: Call for help / release criteria (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-15 Thread Julien BLACHE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Why they don't ask for help? >> > >> > They do so now. Are you (all) prepared to take up the call? >> >> Yes, we are. There are enough interested people here to replace the >> current people in charge.

Re: Call for help / release criteria

2005-03-15 Thread David Schmitt
On Monday 14 March 2005 22:58, Christian Kurz wrote: > On [14/03/05 19:05], David Schmitt wrote: > > They do so now. Are you (all) prepared to take up the call? > > Pardon, but where do you see any public e-Mail from any of the "the > people doing release, ftpmaster, etc." asking for help? I've yet

Re: Call for help / release criteria (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-14 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:49:31PM +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > - First of all, we should take the details as a starting point for > >> > discussion, not as a decision that has made. Neverthe

Re: Call for help / release criteria (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-14 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:05:52PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote: > On Monday 14 March 2005 17:31, Aurélien Jarno wrote: > > Frank Küster a écrit : > > > - First of all, we should take the details as a starting point for > > > discussion, not as a decision that has made. Nevertheless, we must > > >

Re: Call for help / release criteria (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-14 Thread Julien BLACHE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > - First of all, we should take the details as a starting point for >> > discussion, not as a decision that has made. Nevertheless, we must >> > take into account that there are reasons for it: The peo

Call for help / release criteria (was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-14 Thread David Schmitt
On Monday 14 March 2005 17:31, Aurélien Jarno wrote: > Frank Küster a écrit : > > - First of all, we should take the details as a starting point for > > discussion, not as a decision that has made. Nevertheless, we must > > take into account that there are reasons for it: The people doing the