Le vendredi 28 septembre 2012 à 07:49 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit :
> > You can either run your own bot (debian package kgb-bot), or use ours. As
> > for the client, alioth does not have it installed, but you can run it off
> > /home/groups/kgb.
>
> It's installed now.
Thanks to everyone invo
]] Martín Ferrari
> You can either run your own bot (debian package kgb-bot), or use ours. As
> for the client, alioth does not have it installed, but you can run it off
> /home/groups/kgb.
It's installed now.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 03:01:46 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> 1) Client side (i.e. vasks):
>
> 1a) /home/groups/pkg-perl/meta/pkg-perl-post-receive
>
> BASE=/home/groups/pkg-perl
> KGB=/home/groups/kgb/trunk
> CONF=$BASE/kgb-client.conf
> PKG=${DIR%.git}
cat > hooks/reflog
> if [ -e $BASE/KGB-
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:48:23 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > For KGB the concept of a repository is a bit fuzzy. It is just the
> > unit it uses to separate access control (password), channels to
> > broadcast to, and a word in the commit notification. But you can use
> > one of these for hundreds of
Martín Ferrari wrote:
> (you have a really weird reply-to :))
I do? I see no such header..
> For KGB the concept of a repository is a bit fuzzy. It is just the
> unit it uses to separate access control (password), channels to
> broadcast to, and a word in the commit notification. But you can use
(you have a really weird reply-to :))
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
> d-i would like to use your bots, but we have an ever-changing list of
> repositories. It'd be wrong to centralize the list of them in a bot's
> config file. Any thoughts?
For KGB the concept of a repositor
Martín Ferrari wrote:
> If you rather use our bots, we'll need you to provide: a project/repository
> name, an IRC channel, and a password (used to avoid spam, not really
> secure).
d-i would like to use your bots, but we have an ever-changing list of
repositories. It'd be wrong to centralize the
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Not to "to knock 'em when they're down", but since it seems that the CIA.vc
> service has officially closed recently (cannot find exactly when did that
> happen), I think it's worthwhile offering this little project we (dam@,
> gregoa@, and
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:52:52PM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Not to "to knock 'em when they're down", but since it seems that the CIA.vc
> service has officially closed recently (cannot find exactly when did that
> happen)
http://shadowm.rewound.net/blog/archives/245-CIA.vc-is-dead.html
http:/
Hi there!
Not to "to knock 'em when they're down", but since it seems that the CIA.vc
service has officially closed recently (cannot find exactly when did that
happen), I think it's worthwhile offering this little project we (dam@,
gregoa@, and me) have since a few years ago, called KGB (ha-ha).
10 matches
Mail list logo
