* Cyril Brulebois [110822 23:51]:
> Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> > * Adam D. Barratt [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 07:11:08PM +0100]:
> > > Looking at the procps source package in unstable, it appears to have the
> > > same issue. If that's the case, then I'm afraid your question should
> > > really ha
Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> * Adam D. Barratt [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 07:11:08PM +0100]:
> > Looking at the procps source package in unstable, it appears to have the
> > same issue. If that's the case, then I'm afraid your question should
> > really have been "what's the proper way to address thi
* Adam D. Barratt [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 07:11:08PM +0100]:
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 12:19 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > * Cyril Brulebois [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 12:02:17PM +0200]:
> > > Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> > > > 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
> > > >a) Bu
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 12:19 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> * Cyril Brulebois [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 12:02:17PM +0200]:
> > Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
>
> > > 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
> > >a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
> > >b) Build whatever
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:19:13 +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
> But that the procps package is non-essential but seems to be installed
> on (some?) buildds is irrelevant?
>
Yes.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
* Cyril Brulebois [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 12:02:17PM +0200]:
> Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> > 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
> >a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
> >b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?
> Stop using basename on what's
Cyril Brulebois (22/08/2011):
> Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> > 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
> >a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
> >b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?
>
> Stop using basename on what's in /lib, and do that on wh
Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
>a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
>b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?
Stop using basename on what's in /lib, and do that on what's under
debian/tmp.
> 2) How can we ma
Hi,
Christian Hofstaedtler prepared a stable update for procps regarding
#632749 (with ACK from Craig as the procps maintainer and from Adam
from the release team - Cc-ing both of them therefore FYI).
While reviewing the package I noticed an interesting bug, causing
procps in squeeze to have an a
9 matches
Mail list logo
