On 12 December 2014 at 02:23, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>>Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
>>specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
>>name should not grab a generic name like “pathl
On Thursday, December 11, 2014 09:23:36 PM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
> >Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
> >specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
> >name should not grab a generic nam
On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
>specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
>name should not grab a generic name like “pathlib”.
Why not first-come-first-served?
Cheers,
-Barry
Benjamin Drung writes:
> The source is called pathlib, but the binary packages are called
> python-pathlib and python-pathlib-doc.
Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general. This is
specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
name should not grab a
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2014, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Hi,
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Frank Brehm
> >
> > * Package name: pathlib
> > Version : 1.0.1
> > Upstream Author
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Frank Brehm
>
> * Package name: pathlib
> Version : 1.0.1
> Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou
> * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
* License : MIT Licence
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Set of classes to h
7 matches
Mail list logo