On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On 03/03/2013 10:35 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
The license issue was just an example (hence the braces). The reasoning is
that the Debian packaging is supposed to be independent
On 03/04/2013 03:37 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> A great place for maintaining the packaging for Debian is github, for
> example.
Many DDs, including myself, think it's better to host Debian stuff on
Debian infrastructure (that is: alioth.debian.org), and that the
problem with platforms s
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> The license issue was just an example (hence the braces). The reasoning
> is that the Debian packaging is supposed to be independent of upstream,
> especially since we cannot always follow upstream, during a freeze, for
> example.
That makes sense.
> Assume
On 03/03/2013 10:35 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
The license issue was just an example (hence the braces). The reasoning is
that the Debian packaging is supposed to be independent of upstream,
especially since we cannot always follow u
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
> The license issue was just an example (hence the braces). The reasoning is
> that the Debian packaging is supposed to be independent of upstream,
> especially since we cannot always follow upstream, during a freeze, for
> example.
> Assume we
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
>
> On 03/03/2013 08:33 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>> Would you consider adding one of the active contributors to Subsurface
>> as a co-maintainer? This is currently a really fast moving project
>> (3.0.2 will come out tonight or tomorrow, 3.1 is planned for next mon
On 03/03/2013 08:51 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
I'd also be happy to review and sponsor any uploads.
We have several people who offered to step up, a couple of them are
copied on this email...
Great. Just in case ;).
PS: would it be useful for me to include the Debian packaging files in
the git
Khalid El Fathi writes:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to answer only now... I was busy with my work. I think I can update the
> package soon.
That's great news.
Would you consider adding one of the active contributors to Subsurface
as a co-maintainer? This is currently a really fast moving project
(3.0.2 wi
Hi,
On 03/03/2013 08:33 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
Would you consider adding one of the active contributors to Subsurface
as a co-maintainer? This is currently a really fast moving project
(3.0.2 will come out tonight or tomorrow, 3.1 is planned for next month)
and it might be easier to have someon
Hi,
Sorry to answer only now... I was busy with my work. I think I can update the
package soon.
Sincerely,
Le 3 mars 2013 à 18:36, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
a écrit :
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>
>>> The maintainer seems MIA since June 2012, not responding to bug
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
> > The maintainer seems MIA since June 2012, not responding to bug
> > reports nor direct mails.
> > The two most recent upstream releases not packaged.
>
> Why would this be a reason to *remove* a package? Especially after
> such a short time
> The maintainer seems MIA since June 2012, not responding to bug
> reports nor direct mails.
> The two most recent upstream releases not packaged.
Why would this be a reason to *remove* a package? Especially after
such a short time. The package hasn't even been orphaened.
I have seen packages in
12 matches
Mail list logo
