Bug#694308: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge

2016-01-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 14:07:46 +0100 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>No, it will help me on the lintian to get not rebuilt at build time fonts... >> >>Best will be to add a timestamp but i think it destroy reproductible >>build step, so if timestamp could be >>overriden by an env variable (so it could be

Bug#694308: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge

2016-01-01 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 4:54 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 13:55:48 +0100 > Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>If it is GPL-2+ it is not a problem but a few fonts file are released >>under GPL-2 only... It is quite a mess. > > Yes... The best way to solve it is re-license those snippets

Bug#694308: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge

2015-12-31 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 13:55:48 +0100 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >If it is GPL-2+ it is not a problem but a few fonts file are released >under GPL-2 only... It is quite a mess. Yes... The best way to solve it is re-license those snippets to more permissive license like BSD-3-clause or MIT by Adobe,

Bug#694308: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge

2015-12-28 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > >>The originals of several of these functions seem to appear (with >>non-DFSG-free licensing) in the appendices of >>http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/font/5015.Type1_Supp.pdf >> >>In particular, the licensing says: >> >

Bug#694308: non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge

2015-12-27 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, >The originals of several of these functions seem to appear (with >non-DFSG-free licensing) in the appendices of >http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/font/5015.Type1_Supp.pdf > >In particular, the licensing says: > This code, as well as the code in the following appendices, is c