Hi.
Sorry to be late on that discussion (vacation time in between). I'm just
adding a few bits in case it would help.
Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 12:54 +0200, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> Hi,
>
SNIP
> I thought about bts-link as well, of course, but there are some
> differences in what is tried
Hi.
Some more feedback, again.
Le lundi 19 octobre 2009 à 11:21 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > @dons: What are your requirements until you will accept this feature on
> > bugs.d.o, in terms of number of packages or clear consensus on d-devel
> >
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> @dons: What are your requirements until you will accept this feature on
> bugs.d.o, in terms of number of packages or clear consensus on d-devel
> or such or actual inclusion in the policy?
Depends on the complexity of me actually getting the informat
Hi,
Am Montag, den 19.10.2009, 11:20 +0200 schrieb Olivier Berger:
> Le samedi 17 octobre 2009 à 23:27 +0200, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> > just an idea that occured to me right now when filing a bug against a
> > package where I already know that it’s an upstream bug, but I don’t want
> > to spe
Le Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 02:34:24PM +0200, gregor herrmann a écrit :
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:23:02 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > > In order not to bloat the Packages file we where thinking about a
> > > header in debian/copyright (which has, according to DEP5, already
> > > information about the U
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:23:02 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > In order not to bloat the Packages file we where thinking about a
> > header in debian/copyright (which has, according to DEP5, already
> > information about the Upstream-Author and Upstream-Source).
> I'd like to re-iterate my earlier mail
> I'd like to re-iterate my earlier mail on this subject about splitting
> up the Packages file:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00057.html
>
> I heard a rumor that the Description fields were going to be split out
> into Translation-en files and I'd like this trend to continu
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:23 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:27:45 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
>> Implementation-wise, this is probably best implemented via a new
>> control header, similar to Homepage, containing the URL. But of course
>> I’m open for other ideas.
>
> In
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:27:45 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Therefore, I’d find it handy to have, on the header of the package’s bug
> page a link "Search upstream bugtracker" that directly sends me to the
> upstream bugtracker, ideally to a search request for all bugs affecting
> this particula
tag 551386 moreinfo help
thanks
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Therefore, I'd find it handy to have, on the header of the package's
> bug page a link "Search upstream bugtracker" that directly sends me
> to the upstream bugtracker, ideally to a search request for all bugs
> affecti
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
just an idea that occured to me right now when filing a bug against a
package where I already know that it’s an upstream bug, but I don’t want
to spend time finding out
* where the upstream bugtracker
11 matches
Mail list logo
