On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> 2009/2/18 Marc Singer
>
> > It was not my intention to shut you down. I am just trying to figure
> > out how far you've gotten in packaging the program.
>
>
> Sure, no problem. I haven't gotten too far in packaging it because of
2009/2/18 Marc Singer
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 05:47:57PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> > 2009/2/18 Marc Singer
> >
> > > It was not my intention to shut you down. I am just trying to figure
> > > out how far you've gotten in packaging the program.
> >
> >
> > Sure, no problem. I haven't gotte
Twas brillig at 17:47:57 18.02.2009 UTC+00 when iul...@ubuntu.com did gyre and
gimble:
IU> Perhaps we will find a way to get it back.
What about this solution: building git-core & cgit from the one source
package, containing both source trees? This way they won't go
out-of-sync.
--
pgpWVTX
2009/2/18 Marc Singer
> It was not my intention to shut you down. I am just trying to figure
> out how far you've gotten in packaging the program.
Sure, no problem. I haven't gotten too far in packaging it because of
bug #407722.
> There is a serious blockage in pushing cgit into the archiv
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 06:50:55AM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> 2009/2/18 Marc Singer
>
> > Is your package patch available so I can review it?
> >
> > Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> > maintain it?
> >
>
> Yes, you're right, I'm not a DD. Anyway, I've had no
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:14:45PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> maintain it?
Please consider refraining to post comments like this in the
future. Your intention might have been good, but written as you wrote
it, it can discourage non
Le mardi 17 février 2009 à 19:14 -0800, Marc Singer a écrit :
> Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> maintain it?
For a second, I thought AJ was back. Phew.
--
.''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released!
: :' :
`. `' Last night, Darth Vader came down from pla
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> 2009/2/18 Marc Singer
> > Is your package patch available so I can review it?
> >
> > Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> > maintain it?
*shrug*
Have you never been excited about being able to contribute to
Debian? (I foun
2009/2/18 Marc Singer
> Is your package patch available so I can review it?
>
> Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> maintain it?
>
Yes, you're right, I'm not a DD. Anyway, I've had no idea that you're a
DD.
That being said, perhaps it's better to submit wnpp bugs
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> I'm still thinking of a way to get rid of git source and not affect the
> rest.
Get upstream git to stabilise libgit into a proper shared library.
Please see #407722, which I set as blocking the ITP #515793.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debia
2009/2/17 Joerg Jaspert
>
> >> > I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
> >> > it through a sponsor in the next days.
> >> This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning work.
> > Yea, indeed. I completely forgot about it, sorry.
>
> How did you pack
Marc Singer (17/02/2009):
> Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> maintain it?
WHEN DID BEING A DD BECOME A PREREQUISITE FOR MAINTAINING A PACKAGE?
The “you're not a DD” blablabla is quite frustrating already, and I
can't think of a good reason to (mis|ab|)use it, esp
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:30:58PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> Hello Marc.
>
> I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
> it through a sponsor in the next days.
>
> So, I would like to take care of this. May I take over this ITP?
Is your package patch available so
>> > I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
>> > it through a sponsor in the next days.
>> This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning work.
> Yea, indeed. I completely forgot about it, sorry.
How did you package it? If it includes the git source
2009/2/17 Jonathan Wiltshire
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:30:58PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> > I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
> > it through a sponsor in the next days.
>
> This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning work.
>
Yea, indeed.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 06:30:58PM +, Iulian Udrea wrote:
> I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
> it through a sponsor in the next days.
This is one reason why an ITP is expected *before* beginning work.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F
Hello Marc.
I have already packaged this. I was going to submit an ITP and upload
it through a sponsor in the next days.
So, I would like to take care of this. May I take over this ITP?
Cheers!
Iulian
2009/2/17 Marc Singer
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The upstream build of cgit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically
depends on a change to git-core.
http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.de
18 matches
Mail list logo
