On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 10:21 -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> > The current debian/control draft is included below[1]. The current
> > dependencies
> > on package with priority=standard are going to go away (like "less"), unless
> > there are
Daniel Moerner, le Sun 18 Jan 2009 10:21:15 -0800, a écrit :
> Something I don't quite understand is the target audience: most people
> who run a command line install will know exactly what they want
> installed, and won't need a metapackage to do it or to bring in
> extraneous stuff.
Actually I'v
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Daniel Moerner [Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:21:15 -0800]:
>
>> Something that might also be useful would be a nox-debian-devel
>> package which would include tools that everyone needs for packaging
>> (lintian, build-essentials, devscripts, dput |
* Daniel Moerner [Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:21:15 -0800]:
> Something that might also be useful would be a nox-debian-devel
> package which would include tools that everyone needs for packaging
> (lintian, build-essentials, devscripts, dput | dupload, fakeroot, etc)
What does "nox-" have to do with tha
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> The current debian/control draft is included below[1]. The current
> dependencies
> on package with priority=standard are going to go away (like "less"), unless
> there are useful alternatives in which case It might depends on either (?).
I forgot to 'X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel'... so I'm forwarding it.
Subject: ITP: nox -- nox -- Meta package
Package: wnpp
Owner: Frank Lin PIAT
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: nox
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Frank Lin PIAT
* URL :
http://www.klabs.be/~fp
6 matches
Mail list logo
