Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:36:05AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting William Pitcock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Users are very good at missing these jokes. > > > -Rob > > Yes, I hadn't thought of that. I'll just refer to it as a "an advanced > > and powerful syslog daemon" in the short d

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-30 Thread William Pitcock
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 06:36 +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting William Pitcock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > Users are very good at missing these jokes. > > > > > > -Rob > > > > Yes, I hadn't thought of that. I'll just refer to it as a "an advanced > > and powerful syslog daemon" in the sh

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-30 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting William Pitcock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Users are very good at missing these jokes. > > > > -Rob > > Yes, I hadn't thought of that. I'll just refer to it as a "an advanced > and powerful syslog daemon" in the short description then. Without the leading article, then, please...:-). See

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-30 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
William Pitcock wrote: > * Package name: dsyslog > Version : 0.1.0 > Upstream Author : William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://nenolod.net/dsyslog > * License : ISC (BSD-like) > Programming Lang: C > Description : a dumb syslog > dsyslog is

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-30 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 10:02 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:47:45 -0600, William Pitcock > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (on another note, dsyslog is now complete enough that it has replaced > > the syslogd on my desktop.) > > What are the difference with rsyslog whi

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-30 Thread Vincent Bernat
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:47:45 -0600, William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (on another note, dsyslog is now complete enough that it has replaced > the syslogd on my desktop.) What are the difference with rsyslog which also aims at providing a pure modular design? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-29 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 16:22 +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:07 -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:54 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > dsyslog is a dumb, yet advanced syslog daemon, which supports > > > infinite > > > > rules and e

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-29 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/08 23:22, Robert Collins wrote: > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:07 -0600, William Pitcock wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:54 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: dsyslog is a dumb, yet advanced syslog daemon, which supports >>> infinite >>>

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:07 -0600, William Pitcock wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:54 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > dsyslog is a dumb, yet advanced syslog daemon, which supports > > infinite > > > rules and expandability through it's purely modular design. The > > default > > > con

Re: Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-29 Thread William Pitcock
Hi, On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:54 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > > dsyslog is a dumb, yet advanced syslog daemon, which supports > infinite > > rules and expandability through it's purely modular design. The > default > > configuration is a drop in replacement for syslogd. > > What's so dumb about

Bug#463167: ITP: dsyslog -- a dumb syslog

2008-01-29 Thread William Pitcock
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: William Pitcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, I am writing a syslog daemon called dsyslog. Why you ask? Because none of the other syslogd's were designed in the way that I would like, so I figured I would do it myself. * Package name: dsyslog Version