On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:54:27PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Okay, that's two votes for dropping it to I. :) I'll take a closer look
> at what would be involved in adding the infrastructure to keep the
> warnings around at the I level for oldstable stuff. It should be easy
> with debconf and
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 01:59:04PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > (BTW, why was 'settitle' not included in the output of the 'CAPB' command?
> > Seems like it should have been?)
> Because settitle support can be tested for by trying to use the command and
> checking for a resu
Steve Langasek wrote:
> (BTW, why was 'settitle' not included in the output of the 'CAPB' command?
> Seems like it should have been?)
Because settitle support can be tested for by trying to use the command and
checking for a result code of 20.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's an 'informational' level below 'warning' in lintian, right?
> Perhaps versioned deps that are only relevant to oldstable could be
> dropped from W/E to I?
Okay, that's two votes for dropping it to I. :) I'll take a closer look
at what would b
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:09:30PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> For background, there are numerous checks in lintian that ensure that
> dependencies are sufficiently tight to guarantee features used by the
> package. Off the top of my head, I know of:
> * Depending on a new enough debconf to use
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I'd like to get some broader input from the developer community on
>> this, since this affects quite a few lintian checks.
> I think the provided information is still valuable at some level (for
> example it
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I'd like to get some broader input from the developer community on this,
> since this affects quite a few lintian checks.
I think the provided information is still valuable at some level (for
example it could be useful to people backporting to oldstabl
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.29
> Hi.
> I think that the Build-Dep checks that force a specific version of the
> package to be specified should be relaxed once the minimum version is
> available in stable. AIUI, it is ok to drop the version constra
8 matches
Mail list logo
