David Engel writes ("Re: Bug#3838: GCC should depend on CPP, not conflict with
it"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
> > David Engel writes ("Re: Bug#3838: GCC should depend on CPP, not conflict
> > with it"):
> > ...
> > > Because they're designed t
David Engel writes ("Re: Bug#3838: GCC should depend on CPP, not conflict with
it"):
...
> Because they're designed to work together. That's why the FSF
> includes cpp with gcc instead of packaging it separately.
This doesn't much sense to me, at least not witho
Ian Jackson writes:
> David Engel writes ("Re: Bug#3838: GCC should depend on CPP, not conflict
> with it"):
> > Ian Jackson writes:
> ...
> > > Hmm. Why is it necessary for gcc to know which version of cpp is
> > > available, or for it to have exactly
David Engel writes ("Re: Bug#3838: GCC should depend on CPP, not conflict with
it"):
> Ian Jackson writes:
...
> > Hmm. Why is it necessary for gcc to know which version of cpp is
> > available, or for it to have exactly the right one ?
>
> Would you want th
Ian Jackson writes:
> David Engel writes ("Re: Bug#3838: GCC should depend on CPP, not conflict
> with it"):
> > This would force an exact version match between cpp and gcc and I
> > would very much like to avoid those situations. Yes, I know this is
> > already
5 matches
Mail list logo
