Debian Bug Tracking System writes:
> Le Lun 29 Mai 2006 03:40, Matthias Klose a =E9crit :
>
> > the only thing that is correct. is the syntax. everything else is
> > wrong. the messages should have been generated for gcc-snapshot (if
> > at all), but not for 4.1.
>
> debian bug http://bugs.debian
Le Lun 29 Mai 2006 07:50, Thomas Bushnell BSG a écrit :
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Um... usertags have user-defined semantics. How can you claim that
> > the usertags being set are wrong?
>
> As I understand it, the complaint is that bts-link is changing user
> tags set by t
Le Lun 29 Mai 2006 03:40, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> the only thing that is correct. is the syntax. everything else is
> wrong. the messages should have been generated for gcc-snapshot (if
> at all), but not for 4.1.
debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=356569
is about gcc-
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 03:40:59AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> > What problems with the information in the BTS are you talking about?
>
>> the usertags, which are wrongly set and removed.
>
>> please don't get me wrong; generally the btslink informa
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 03:40:59AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > What problems with the information in the BTS are you talking about?
> the usertags, which are wrongly set and removed.
> please don't get me wrong; generally the btslink information is
> useful, but I do see the BTS maintainers
Don Armstrong writes:
> On Mon, 29 May 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Don Armstrong writes:
> > > On Sun, 28 May 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > this bug is fixed for 4.1; with these changes you invalidate the
> > > > information kept in the Debian BTS. Please fix it, or stop it.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Don Armstrong writes:
> > On Sun, 28 May 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > this bug is fixed for 4.1; with these changes you invalidate the
> > > information kept in the Debian BTS. Please fix it, or stop it.
> >
> > This has nothing to do with bugs.deb
reopen 369257
severity 369257 serious
thanks
Don Armstrong writes:
> reassign 369257 general
> severity 369257 normal
> thanks
>
> On Sun, 28 May 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > this bug is fixed for 4.1; with these changes you invalidate the
> > information kept in the Debian BTS. Please fix it,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 369257
Bug#369257: remote bug tracking system doesn't look at versions
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 369257 serious
Bug#369257: remote bug tracking system doesn't look at versions
Severity set to `serio
reassign 369257 general
severity 369257 normal
thanks
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Matthias Klose wrote:
> this bug is fixed for 4.1; with these changes you invalidate the
> information kept in the Debian BTS. Please fix it, or stop it.
This has nothing to do with bugs.debian.org or the BTS at all. Talk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 369257 general
Bug#369257: remote bug tracking system doesn't look at versions
Bug reassigned from package `bugs.debian.org' to `general'.
> severity 369257 normal
Bug#369257: remote bug tracking system doesn't loo
11 matches
Mail list logo