Re: Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-11 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Historically such >> > problems were unpleasantly frequent on buildds due to a combination of >> > buggy >> > postrm scripts, and a bug in

Re: Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:24:47PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Historically such > > problems were unpleasantly frequent on buildds due to a combination of buggy > > postrm scripts, and a bug in dpkg's rollback support when calling dpkg > > --purge fo

Re: Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread Frank Küster
LaMont Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > or a bug in some >> > maintainer script or other; >> How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing >> an arch-all packa

Re: Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread LaMont Jones
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > or a bug in some > > maintainer script or other; > How a bug in a maintainer script could have the result that installing > an arch-all package fails because an other arch-all package is no

Re: Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> It *seems* it has been fixed; but I don't know whether it has just >> disappeared, or has been fixed by human intervention, and if yes by >> which. Since the first may be true, it might

Re: Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > >> The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as > >> #344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, do

Re: Bug#344538: hppa dependency problems on build of pdns

2006-01-10 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:37:53PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: >> The same happened to the planner package, and has been reported as >> #344538. It seems that hppa buildd is broken, don't know yet whether >> the buildd admin (Lamont) or anybody of the de