> Wouldn't it be easier to do something like I did with BIND -- detect
> the "protocol not available" (ENOPROTOOPT?) and don't use the feature,
> instead of calling it an error...
That was my thought. These patches should do it.
--- traceroute-4.4BSD/traceroute.c Sun Jan 28 22:47:27 199
> Michael Shields writes:
> Package: netstd Version: 2.05-1
> Debian 1.1 is supposed to work with kernel 1.2.13. But traceroute
> is broken.
Who said that? We are running 2.0.x as _STABLE_ kernel release ...
Dominik
> > Michael Shields writes:
>
> > Package: netstd Version: 2.05-1
>
> > Debian 1.1 is supposed to work with kernel 1.2.13. But traceroute
> > is broken.
>
> Who said that? We are running 2.0.x as _STABLE_ kernel release ...
Bruce Perens said a few days ago that you could probably u
Wouldn't it be easier to do something like I did with BIND -- detect
the "protocol not available" (ENOPROTOOPT?) and don't use the feature,
instead of calling it an error...
You (Peter Tobias) wrote:
> Michael Shields wrote:
> > Package: netstd
> > Version: 2.05-1
> >
> > Debian 1.1 is supposed to work with kernel 1.2.13. But traceroute is
> > broken.
> >
> > traceroute: IP_HDRINCL: Protocol not available
>
> I can disable it, but that would also disable it fo
Michael Shields wrote:
> Package: netstd
> Version: 2.05-1
>
> Debian 1.1 is supposed to work with kernel 1.2.13. But traceroute is broken.
>
> traceroute: IP_HDRINCL: Protocol not available
I can disable it, but that would also disable it for all Debian users
that use 1.3 or 2.0 kernels (w
Package: netstd
Version: 2.05-1
Debian 1.1 is supposed to work with kernel 1.2.13. But traceroute is broken.
traceroute: IP_HDRINCL: Protocol not available
--
Shields, CrossLink.
7 matches
Mail list logo