Sam Watkins wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:09:41PM -0500, Kevin McCarty wrote:
>
>> the software contains what appears to be code derived from cernlib
>> (GPL) [3] and Xclass (LGPL) [4] while having a license incompatible
>> with either.
>
> They likely are allowed to use cernlib, however x
Sam Watkins wrote:
> I wrote to them just now, and Fons said:
>
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> we are in the process of removing the single non OS limitation from our
>> license in the very near future (coming months/weeks). The xclass derived
>> work is solely contained in one single library libGui. The au
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:05:10AM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> I read the threads you linked to above, but I couldn't find a reference
> to anybody explaining the ROOT guys what the problem is. Did anybody
> try, what was their response?
I wrote to them just now, and Fons said:
> Hi Sam,
>
>
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:09:41 -0500
Kevin McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are two problems: first, the license [1] forbids redistribution
> of modified binaries without permission of the authors, which some
> have argued makes it unsuitable even for non-free [2]; second, and
> worse, the
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:09:41PM -0500, Kevin McCarty wrote:
> Could someone please add Root (http://root.cern.ch/) to the list of software
> that cannot be packaged, http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
> the software contains what appears to be code derived from cernlib
> (GPL) [
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Could someone please add Root (http://root.cern.ch/) to the list of software
that cannot be packaged, http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
? There have been several attempts at ITPs:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/1999/12/m
6 matches
Mail list logo
