Re: Bug#27697: auto-include-dependency failure case

1998-10-13 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, Avery Pennarun wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 06:47:14PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > What I have been doing of late is generating the .d file when the .o file > > is built. Nothing depends on the .d file but if it exists it is included. > > This makes the .o file d

Re: Bug#27697: auto-include-dependency failure case

1998-10-13 Thread Avery Pennarun
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 06:47:14PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > What I have been doing of late is generating the .d file when the .o file > is built. Nothing depends on the .d file but if it exists it is included. > This makes the .o file depend on all included files and the .c file > automatic

Re: Bug#27697: auto-include-dependency failure case

1998-10-13 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On 12 Oct 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > > To cut a long story short, you have some .c files that depend > on a .h file. Initially, that .h file does not depend on > anything. You have set it up so that the dependency files are created > for the .c files, and, sure enough, the de

Re: Bug#27697: auto-include-dependency failure case

1998-10-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, To cut a long story short, you have some .c files that depend on a .h file. Initially, that .h file does not depend on anything. You have set it up so that the dependency files are created for the .c files, and, sure enough, the dependency files are created for the .c files when th