On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:04:05PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> if 'boot-loader' was not a real package (not sure if it requires a new
> catagory or if it fits under meta or virtual) and then when you did:
> apt-get install boot-loader
> it (dpkg or apt -- not sure) checked your ARCH and
Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - Getting the packages into testing, which was previously apparently
> > impossible.
> > - Avoiding the common problem with task packages that if you remove
> > one package in the task, you have to remove the task package as
> > well, since its dependecies
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:17:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:16:56PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 12:03:48AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > Assume a package would recommend grub which is only available on i386.
> > > There are two cases:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:56:06AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041004 00:40]:
> > On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 02:53:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > We would still list everything in recommends. There were many reasons why
> > > I
> > > moved all contents of t
4 matches
Mail list logo
