Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-17 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:28:31PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 09:33, Cameron Patrick wrote: > > I'm a native English speaker and I don't believe I've ever heard the > > term de-archiver; its meaning is clear, but it sounds 'wrong'. The > > hyphen, especially, looks out of place

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Paul Hampson
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 10:33:47PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > | Hmm, do you mean that *you* don't speak about de-archivers? > | [ This is the first time I hear about this in 6 years ]. > | > | Google says: > | > | dearchiver

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Joe Drew
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 09:33, Cameron Patrick wrote: > I'm a native English speaker and I don't believe I've ever heard the > term de-archiver; its meaning is clear, but it sounds 'wrong'. The > hyphen, especially, looks out of place. "Unarchiver" is what I'd use > if I had to coin a word for it,

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Cameron Patrick
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: | Hmm, do you mean that *you* don't speak about de-archivers? | [ This is the first time I hear about this in 6 years ]. | | Google says: | | dearchiver 391 hits | de-archiver 1660 hits | unarchiver 1240 hits | un-archiver 1500 hi

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:04:15AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:52:53PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > Description : De-archiver for .ace files > > > > > > This is clumsy. Please say "extraction utility for .ace

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 10:57:23PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > I don't mind changing it, but you should speak with the maintainers of > > arj and unzip first (just for the sake of consistency). > > In the case of package descriptions, I don't think that consistently bad > is better than incon

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:04:15AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:52:53PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > Description : De-archiver for .ace files > > > > This is clumsy. Please say "extraction utility for .ace archive files" > > It's analogous to the descriptio

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Millan
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:52:53PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Description : De-archiver for .ace files > > This is clumsy. Please say "extraction utility for .ace archive files" It's analogous to the descriptions in arj and unzip. > or something similar (see descriptions for unarj, z

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-16 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 07:23:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > * Package name: unace > Version : 1.2b > Upstream Author : Marcel Lemke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : None. Google for "unace-1.2b.tar.gz" I hope you can do better t

Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

2003-11-15 Thread Robert Millan
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: unace Version : 1.2b Upstream Author : Marcel Lemke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : None. Google for "unace-1.2b.tar.gz" * License : Ambigous Description : De-archiver for .ace files I'm referring to the 1.2b r