Re: Bug#188665: RC issue

2003-04-14 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>> On Sun, 13 Apr 2003 22:34:39 +0300, >> Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm now getting a redefinition error and couldn't easily figure it > out: > In file included from conf_analysis_yy.h:5, > from conf_analysis.yy:7: > /usr/include/FlexLexer.h:112: r

Re: Bug#188665: RC issue

2003-04-13 Thread Jarno Elonen
I'm now getting a redefinition error and couldn't easily figure it out: In file included from conf_analysis_yy.h:5, from conf_analysis.yy:7: /usr/include/FlexLexer.h:112: redefinition of `class yyFlexLexer' /usr/include/FlexLexer.h:112: previous definition of `clas

Re: Bug#188665: RC issue

2003-04-13 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> I understand that this requires all packages using lex to > massage their lexers to conform to the new behaviour of flex; but the > gains in reduced complexity of the scanner and reentrancy and > standards compliance are well worth it. > and like the gcc 3.2 change over, the upstreams

Re: Bug#188665: RC issue

2003-04-13 Thread Manoj Srivastava
clone 188665 -1 -2 reassign -1 binutils reassign -2 openoffice.org reassign 188665 xfree86-common thanks Hi, [Since flex is standard, perhaps this migration issue needs wider audience, hence the CC to debian-devel] The behaviour of flex has changed in the latest release,