Ian Jackson writes:
> > Matt Swift writes:
> >
> > # ensure proper permissions and ownership
> > chown --recursive root:texmf $DIRS
> > chmod --recursive ug=rwX,o=rX $DIRS
> Our packaging guidelines say that the things should be owned by
> root.root in general. Is there a good reason to us
Matthew Swift writes:
> I recommend that a script like the following, called something like
> 'maintain-texmf', be included with kpathsea.deb, run during its
> postinst, and that a link be placed to the script in cron.daily or
> cron.weekly. (I do not feel strongly about the (new) user group
> "te
Package: kpathsea
Version: 2.6-1
The presence of an up-to-date ls-R database, while not necessary,
drastically improves the efficiency of the TeX system. The kpathsea
package should create one on installation and have cron maintain it.
All packages that install into the /usr/lib/texmf tree should
3 matches
Mail list logo
