Bug#1794: bin/sh is shell when none specified in /etc/passwd

1995-11-03 Thread Ian Jackson
Bruce Perens writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > [empty shell fields in /etc/passwd mean /bin/sh] > > This is common practice, and perhaps important if you are using > a Yellow Pages password database that originates on a different > system. I see. I don't really approve, but such things are to

Bug#1794: bin/sh is shell when none specified in /etc/passwd

1995-11-02 Thread Bruce Perens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > [empty shell fields in /etc/passwd mean /bin/sh] This is common practice, and perhaps important if you are using a Yellow Pages password database that originates on a different system. Use "/dev/null" as the shell if you want to disable the login. Thanks

Bug#1794: /bin/sh is shell when none specified in /etc/passwd

1995-11-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Package: ? I recently created a special-purpose entry in /etc/passwd, with an empty shell field. I was surprised to see that `finger' reported the shell as `/bin/sh', and tried using `su' from a root shell to su to the account. Sure enough, I got a shell. This seems wrong to me, particularly in