Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Adam Heath wrote: > What you want is dpkg-divert. But I vote against diverting /usr/bin/sed. I have to agree with Adam, diverting sed might be dangerous. HOWEVER, nothing forbids you to package it simply as ssed for now, then run very comprehensive regression tests to make s

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-26 Thread Adam Heath
On 26 Dec 2001, Ganesan R wrote: > 1. The source tarball is still called sed (the latest version is >sed-3.52.tar.gz). What are my options of dealing with this other than >asking upstream to change the source tarball? You can rename the source tarball when uploading to debian. No problem

Re: Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-25 Thread Ganesan R
> "rganesan" == rganesan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package: wnpp > Version: N/A > Severity: wishlist > ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, including Perl > regular expressions and much greater speed than GNU sed. A few experimental > features were mutuated f

Bug#126434: ITP: super-sed -- An enhanced version of sed

2001-12-25 Thread rganesan
Package: wnpp Version: N/A Severity: wishlist ssed is a version of sed that supports a few new features, including Perl regular expressions and much greater speed than GNU sed. A few experimental features were mutuated from Perl, including in-place editing (the `i' flag) and the ability to