Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2022-03-31 21:28:05, Sean Anderson wrote: > On 3/31/22 9:21 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> On 2022-03-31 21:15:21, Sean Anderson wrote: >>> OK, I uploaded a package to >>> https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-c2h5oh-datasize/ >>> >>> Can you have a quick look at it? I used dh-

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Sean Anderson
On 3/31/22 9:21 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2022-03-31 21:15:21, Sean Anderson wrote: OK, I uploaded a package to https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-c2h5oh-datasize/ Can you have a quick look at it? I used dh-make-golang, but if there's anything I need to tweak I'd like

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2022-03-31 21:15:21, Sean Anderson wrote: > OK, I uploaded a package to > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-c2h5oh-datasize/ > > Can you have a quick look at it? I used dh-make-golang, but if there's > anything I need to tweak I'd like to know before I start uploading. Th

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Sean Anderson
On 3/31/22 9:05 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2022-03-31 20:54:32, Sean Anderson wrote: On 3/31/22 8:36 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] Basically I looked at this and thought "OK that's 20 or so first order deps, I can do this" and then I discovered that several of these had 20 first-order

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2022-03-31 20:54:32, Sean Anderson wrote: > On 3/31/22 8:36 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] > Basically I looked at this and thought "OK that's 20 or so first order deps, > I can do this" and then I discovered that several of these had 20 first-order > deps of their own. Typical dependency h

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Sean Anderson
On 3/31/22 8:36 PM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2022-03-31 18:55:44, Sean Anderson wrote: Hi Antoine, On 3/31/22 10:19 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2022-03-31 10:06:40, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] I've packaged around 20 dependencies so far. Impressive! Good job! I have yet to submit t

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2022-03-31 18:55:44, Sean Anderson wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > On 3/31/22 10:19 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: >> On 2022-03-31 10:06:40, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] > I've packaged around 20 dependencies so far. Impressive! Good job! > I have yet to submit them (primarily because I find doing thi

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Sean Anderson
Hi Antoine, On 3/31/22 10:19 AM, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2022-03-31 10:06:40, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] From that perspective, it's actually worse than Grafana, which has less dependencies, believe it or not. But Grafana is also a webapp which is where it really hurt us, because there y

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2022-03-31 10:06:40, Antoine Beaupré wrote: [...] > From that perspective, it's actually worse than Grafana, which has less > dependencies, believe it or not. But Grafana is also a webapp which is > where it really hurt us, because there you also need to package 300+ > nodejs dependencies (!).

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2022-03-31 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2021-12-19 07:30:57, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > >> The upstream package name conflicts with the existing package loki >> ("MCMC linkage analysis on general pedigrees"). However, that package is >> "dead upstream" (according to debian/watch), so p

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2021-12-25 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Du, 19 dec 21, 11:37:21, Sean Anderson wrote: > > On 12/18/21 6:08 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > > > On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > > > > > > > To: sub...@bugs.debian.org > > > > Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org > > > > > > In future, please use

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2021-12-19 Thread Sean Anderson
On 12/18/21 6:08 PM, Paul Wise wrote: On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: To: sub...@bugs.debian.org Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org In future, please use X-Debbugs-CC, so that the recipients get your bug numbers too and so they can CC the bug

Re: Bug#1001903: ITP: loki-database -- Like Prometheus, but for logs.

2021-12-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 12:20 -0500, Sean Anderson wrote: > The upstream package name conflicts with the existing package loki > ("MCMC linkage analysis on general pedigrees"). However, that package is > "dead upstream" (according to debian/watch), so perhaps this package can > get the name eventual