Re: Broken *deb's in hamm

1997-12-05 Thread Guy Maor
Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could somebody modify the upload scripts to check packages and source > files before moving them from incomming or is that to mauch cpu? The install scripts do compare md5sums with the .changes and .dsc files, and they run dpkg-deb -f on all the .debs. Bit

Re: Broken *deb's in hamm

1997-12-03 Thread Joey Hess
Brederlow wrote: > Esspecially anoying (for me) is xfishtank_2.2.orig.tar.gz for me, > cause the bin (or my X) is broken and I want to compile a debug > version of it. Seems to have gotten corrupted on master, I'll reupload the source. -- see shy jo -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-

Re: Broken *deb's in hamm

1997-12-03 Thread Brederlow
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sten Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have tried downloading them from a different mirror with the same > > result. Are these packages really bogus, or am I just cursed? I don't > > rely on these packages, but dselect complains, and that is a

Re: Broken *deb's in hamm

1997-12-03 Thread Rob Browning
Sten Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have tried downloading them from a different mirror with the same > result. Are these packages really bogus, or am I just cursed? I don't > rely on these packages, but dselect complains, and that is a little > annoying. As far as I can tell, there a

Broken *deb's in hamm

1997-12-03 Thread Sten Anderson
I have recently downloaded a mirror of Hamm, but some of the packages appear to be broken. The following command: $ find . -name *.deb -exec dpkg -I "{}" ';' | grep 'not a debian' results in (slightly edited): dpkg-deb: `./debian/hamm/binary-i386/editors/emacspeak_7.0-1.deb' is not a d