Bug#911235: ITP: multiblend -- multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic images

2018-10-17 Thread Fernando Toledo
blender for the seamless blending of panoramic images, such as those created with PTAssembler <http://www.tawbaware.com/ptasmblr.htm> (my personal favourite), Hugin <http://hugin.sourceforge.net/>, or PTGui <http://www.ptgui.com/>. It is a significantly faster drop-in alter

Bug#911206: RFP: multiblend -- multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic images

2018-10-16 Thread Fernando Toledo
nd* is a multi-level image blender for the seamless blending of panoramic images, such as those created with PTAssembler <http://www.tawbaware.com/ptasmblr.htm> (my personal favourite), Hugin <http://hugin.sourceforge.net/>, or PTGui <http://www.ptgui.com/>. It is a sign

Bug#641364: ITP: yafaray-blender2.5-exporter -- YafaRay Exporter for Blender 2.5x

2011-09-12 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi" Hi! YafaRay Project (former yafray, now dead) consists of two parts: + Core software, doing the heavy-duty work (ITP #638653); + Exporter software, that creates a interface between the modeler (in this case, Blende

Bug#570053: RFH: blender -- Very fast and versatile 3D modeller/renderer

2010-02-15 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the blender package. Blender is nice, but might benefit from more hands than only mine. If you want to help, please have a look at this checklist which should help you see if you fit the profile (if you don't, don't

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:07 PM, martin f krafft wrote: > No, but maybe we can revive it? Would you write to the domain owner? It is now a spam site so that may be costly or impossible. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Maximiliano Curia [2009.08.03.1529 +0200]: > distrodev.org seems to have died sometime around 2007, do you know > if there is any "replacement" for this? No, but maybe we can revive it? Would you write to the domain owner? -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' :

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-03 Thread Cyril Brulebois
o<, so people noticed this discussion and brought it up on #blendercoders, where I just had a tiny chat. It looks like they agreed that the ffmpeg situation is quite unfortunate (that's the most problematic external embedded library we both could think of), but there are some technical stuff that

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-03 Thread Maximiliano Curia
Hola martin f krafft! El 03/08/2009 a las 10:48 escribiste: > Without doubt, upstream should be the place where cross-distro > integration happens. However, if upstream is not interested, then > the idea of vcs-pkg is to have a repo used by all distros, which is > suitable for everyone. It doesn't

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-03 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2009.08.02.2130 +0200]: > Before going deeper into it, I have to say I've been trying to > resist the urge of going public with it, and coping with my duties > as much as I could. But it's just too much now. Members of the > French Cabal (which of course doesn't exist)

Approaching non-integratable software, was: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-03 Thread Reinhard Tartler
[ moving discussion to -project. Please follow up on -devel if you are contributing to the technical discussion and -project for the project wide parts ] Cyril Brulebois writes: > It's been a while and I'm now really wondering what to do with > Blender. So that everyone can

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-02 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Zitat von Christian Perrier : Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): 4) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.blender.devel/19895 Patch to add support for system-wide FTGL. I kind of get flamed for thinking about using something else than what blender provides. And who cares about

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-02 Thread Ben Finney
Christian Perrier writes: > Just drop that blender thing and announce this loudly enough, > preferrably by coordinating with other distro maintainers. That will > eventually trigger a fork from people who have a more collaborative > way of thinking. This coordination would probably

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-02 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > 4) http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.blender.devel/19895 > > Patch to add support for system-wide FTGL. I kind of get flamed for > thinking about using something else than what blender provides. And > who cares about shared l

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
any other activity and orphan blender. > Although, it might be interesting to work together with the > maintainers of other distros to maintain a set of common patches to > improve the integration of blender and linux distros. Sure. Thanks to the “whohas” utility Paul kindly pointed me

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-02 Thread Maximiliano Curia
a git repository, so if someone sometime picks it up, > it should be quite easy not to start from scratch again. Given the points you listed before, its understandable if you prefer to dedicate your time to any other activity and orphan blender. Although, it might be interesting to wo

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-02 Thread Christian Perrier
o-no and you'll waste too much valuable time in maintaining that package. Of course, being the arse that I am, I would *also* craft a mail to upstream mailing lists with a careful explanation about the reasons leading to the package being abandoned. Something like "Debian stops dist

Re: What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > It's been a while and I'm now really wondering what to do with > Blender. So that everyone can understand, I'm going to try and sum up > what I'm facing. Please note it's not intended to be a rant, rathe

What to do with (packages like) Blender?

2009-08-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi folks. It's been a while and I'm now really wondering what to do with Blender. So that everyone can understand, I'm going to try and sum up what I'm facing. Please note it's not intended to be a rant, rather a summary of what I've to deal with. * Upstream d

Bug#454189: ITP: brad -- Blender based user interface for Radiance

2007-12-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Python Description : Blender based user interface for Radiance Blended RADiance (brad) is able to export Blender models to Radiance, both static models or animations, to make it easier to setup the simulation parameters, to calculate luminance/illuminance values on arbitrary grids. The binary packag

motors for Washing Machine, Electrical Fan, Refrigerator, Fume Hood, Food Blender, etc

2000-03-20 Thread Yuan Feng
Yuanfeng Motor Company is a professional motor manufacturer and are dedicated to developing and researching high efficient products. Various types of motor with different specification are for Washing Machine, Electrical Fan, Refrigerator, Fume Hood, Food Blender, etc. All motors we

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-23 Thread Herbert Xu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I maintain the mesa package. As no packages (before this) depended on > a libc5 version of mesa, I stopped including them. Adding them back > seems like a step backwards. It would be much better if you could > get blender recompiled wit

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-20 Thread Petra
be much better if you could > >> get blender recompiled with libc6 based libs. > > It's non-free stuff and no source available (at least yet). The authors > keep it free for non commercial use and are selling support + goodies for > it. > There should be statically

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread James A . Treacy
> Where is the Mesa 2.6 for hamm then?? My box shows mesa as a > local/missing file. I have mesa installed though. > It's in there. Here are the relevant entries in the lates copy of hamm. Package: mesa-doc Version

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread Petra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sun, 19 Apr 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://www.neogeo.nl/blender.html > > binary doesn't work with debian hamm, because: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/b/blenderLinux_1.30 > ldd blender > libMesaGLU.so.2 => not f

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread Shaleh
James A.Treacy wrote: > > I maintain the mesa package. As no packages (before this) depended on > a libc5 version of mesa, I stopped including them. Adding them back > seems like a step backwards. It would be much better if you could > get blender recompiled with libc6 based libs.

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread Jaakko Niemi
>> I maintain the mesa package. As no packages (before this) depended on >> a libc5 version of mesa, I stopped including them. Adding them back >> seems like a step backwards. It would be much better if you could >> get blender recompiled with libc6 based libs. It's

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread James A . Treacy
I maintain the mesa package. As no packages (before this) depended on a libc5 version of mesa, I stopped including them. Adding them back seems like a step backwards. It would be much better if you could get blender recompiled with libc6 based libs. Jay Treacy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread Richard Braakman
6/lib > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/b/blenderLinux_1.30 > ldd ./blender It is logical that you get both libc's this way, you're deliberately mixing them. It's a libc5 program, and the /usr/X11R6/lib contains libc6 libraries. > i do not know, what i should do to run this program.

Blender 3D

1998-04-19 Thread erikyyy
http://www.neogeo.nl/blender.html binary doesn't work with debian hamm, because: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/b/blenderLinux_1.30 > ldd blender libMesaGLU.so.2 => not found libMesaGL.so.2 => not found libXmu.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXmu

Re: Blender

1998-04-16 Thread Ben Gertzfield
>>>>> "Behan" == Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Behan> Darn. I downloaded blender today, but it needs a libc5 Behan> version of mesa 2.6 and libjpeg. So it doesn't work on my Behan> stock hamm system 8(. Behan> I wrote

Blender

1998-04-16 Thread Behan Webster
Darn. I downloaded blender today, but it needs a libc5 version of mesa 2.6 and libjpeg. So it doesn't work on my stock hamm system 8(. I wrote to the people at Blender and asked about a libc6 version, and what license they were going to release it under (pointing them to the DFSG of cours