Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-19 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:37:42PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > The version in testing has a known security vulnerability, which was > fixed by upstream in their newer upstream release. I sent a more > stripped debdiff to make the review easier. Removing Windows/MacOS > changes and auto-generated

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-19 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Freitag, den 09.11.2012, 10:12 + schrieb Neil McGovern: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:54:23AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Quoting Benjamin Drung (bdr...@debian.org): > > > Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2012, 20:35 + schrieb Jon Dowland: > > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:29:02PM +0100,

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-09 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:54:23AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Benjamin Drung (bdr...@debian.org): > > Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2012, 20:35 + schrieb Jon Dowland: > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:29:02PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > Hm, I filed two unblock requests after t

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Christian PERRIER (09/11/2012): > Well, I bet that our estimated colleagues in the Release Team are not > robots […] [ OK ] Turing test. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Benjamin Drung (bdr...@debian.org): > Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2012, 20:35 + schrieb Jon Dowland: > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:29:02PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > Hm, I filed two unblock requests after that deadline, but before reading > > > the announce mail about it. > > > >

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2012, 20:35 + schrieb Jon Dowland: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:29:02PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Hm, I filed two unblock requests after that deadline, but before reading > > the announce mail about it. > > You don't state whether the decision impacts them or no

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:21:30PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > Apologies for the lack of clarity in the d-d-a posting - the new > acceptance criteria are for unblocks filed after 11:54:49 + today. No problem - thanks for the clarification! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:29:02PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Hm, I filed two unblock requests after that deadline, but before reading > the announce mail about it. You don't state whether the decision impacts them or not, but so it goes… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lis

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Holger Levsen
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Hm, I filed two unblock requests after that deadline, but before reading > the announce mail about it. get a lawyer, quick! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Benjamin Drung
Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2012, 19:21 + schrieb Neil McGovern: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:18:55PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:40:18PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > Which policy applies to #685913 (and all the other open unblocks)? The > > > policy announced at the

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 05:18:55PM +, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:40:18PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > Which policy applies to #685913 (and all the other open unblocks)? The > > policy announced at the beginning of the freeze or the current policy? > > …or the time the unblo

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Jon Dowland
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:40:18PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Which policy applies to #685913 (and all the other open unblocks)? The > policy announced at the beginning of the freeze or the current policy? …or the time the unblock was filed? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Neil McGovern wrote: > The policy and diff from the start can be found at > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html Which policy applies to #685913 (and all the other open unblocks)? The policy announced at the beginning of the freeze or the current pol

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:09:51PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Neil McGovern wrote: > > > Unblocks and Freeze Policy > > -- > > ... > > We're also reducing the acceptance criteria [RM:POLICY] - we're now only > > going > > to accept: > > ... >

Re: Bits from the release team - Freeze update

2012-11-08 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Neil McGovern wrote: > Unblocks and Freeze Policy > -- > ... > We're also reducing the acceptance criteria [RM:POLICY] - we're now only going > to accept: > ... Which policy applies in the case of unblock requests that are pending action by