Eduard Block wrote:
>#include
>* Steve McIntyre [Wed, Dec 20 2006, 06:29:04PM]:
>
>> Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
>> ==
>>
>> The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
>> choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
>> meant to b
#include
* Steve McIntyre [Wed, Dec 20 2006, 06:29:04PM]:
> Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
> ==
>
> The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
> choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
> meant to be enough to install a fully-f
Note that the XFCE CD originally announced in the head of this thread is
actually working now.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-xfce-CD-1.iso
It won't install xdm though.. that will probably be fixed in time for
next week's build, along with hopefull
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 08:32:28PM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>[snip]
>> mips
>>
>> jealously scribbles all over the first 512 bytes
>
>I figure that's a DVH "Disk Volume Header" as used on SGI machines.
Yup, exactly. I borrowed the layout from your own genisovh
progra
Steve McIntyre wrote:
[snip]
> mips
>
> jealously scribbles all over the first 512 bytes
I figure that's a DVH "Disk Volume Header" as used on SGI machines.
> mipsel
> ==
> bytes 000-008 : 0-padding
> 008-011 : magic header
> 012-015 : boot mode
> 016-019 : load address
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:57:44PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>Steve McIntyre dijo [Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +]:
>> Bad news I'm afraid. I've worked through the mkisofs boot code again,
>> and I get:
>> (...)
>> I'm looking further to see if it's at all possible to get (e.g.) hppa
>> and
[ Please follow the Reply-To: and head over to debian-cd if you want
to discuss this further... ]
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>Bad news I'm afraid. I've worked through the mkisofs boot code again,
>and I get:
>
>alpha:Writing alpha boot descriptor at ext
Steve McIntyre dijo [Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 03:04:54PM +]:
> Bad news I'm afraid. I've worked through the mkisofs boot code again,
> and I get:
> (...)
> I'm looking further to see if it's at all possible to get (e.g.) hppa
> and alpha to live in the same boot sector, but it's really not likely.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:33:18PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:43:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>> > I'm sure they're, so can't we go for a new multiarch containing hppa
>> > and ia64 only or even i386, hppa and ia64 ?
>
>> Hmm, keeping i386 on it is an interesting idea.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 01:21:01PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 22 December 2006 11:07, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this is done (I assume it's not) but I would really like
> > the DVDs / CDs to have a 'documentation media' which could be used to re
Hi,
On Friday 22 December 2006 11:07, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is done (I assume it's not) but I would really like
> the DVDs / CDs to have a 'documentation media' which could be used to read
> documentation without having to install the system.
I like the ide
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 06:29:04PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm still expecting to add Live CDs to the list here before we
> release. Otherwise, I think we're about set. If there's anything else
> you'd like us to do or anything you'd like to ask about, please reply
> to this mail - note the
Joey Hess wrote:
> I checked the log, the current muti dvd doesn't seem to have any desktop
> packages on it, not even gnome-desktop-environment.
Wrong log as it turns out. The gnome task is there, in full, as are
almost all other tasks, except for a few of the last language tasks. The
kde task di
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 03:43:55PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > I'm sure they're, so can't we go for a new multiarch containing hppa
> > and ia64 only or even i386, hppa and ia64 ?
> Hmm, keeping i386 on it is an interesting idea. Or it could have alpha,
> hppa, and ia64, for the big/old/weird/64 b
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 16:27 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > It's somewhat a shame not to have gnome-office, or at least gimp,
> > inkscape and gnumeric, which are by many points superior to other
> > alternatives.
>
> We do have gimp in the desktop task. I'm willi
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> It's somewhat a shame not to have gnome-office, or at least gimp,
> inkscape and gnumeric, which are by many points superior to other
> alternatives.
We do have gimp in the desktop task. I'm willing to consider gnumeric
and inkscape. Actually I wouldn't really mind revisi
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 16:03 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > Not having "gnome" on a single CD is understandable given how much we've
> > bloated this metapackage.
>
> Actually, we don't even include the gnome metapackage in the full
> gnome-desktop task. gnome-office, gdm-themes and gnome-
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Are you talking of gnome-core or gnome-desktop-environment? gnome-core
> is indeed really basic, but g-d-e already includes a complete desktop.
gnome-desktop-environment is the sole key package in the gnome-desktop
task, and nearly the only one from that task that current
Le mercredi 20 décembre 2006 à 14:21 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
> > CD#1.
>
> True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
Are you talking of gnome-core or gnome-desktop-enviro
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Do you know what's broken in Xfce cd? Is it tasksel related? I hope not.
Missing task file, it should be fixed in the next build.
> Sounds great, could you give me a link with the log or check it in the
> next build please?
I checked the log, the current muti dvd doesn't
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:04:28PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
(...)
>>In case it's not obvious, the 3 arches picked for these discs are
>>simply the most common end-user systems out there. There is scope for
>>producing more multi-arch disc
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:04:28PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
>Let me thanks the debian-desktop, debian-installer and tasksel team
>too. Without them, that stuff would be useless.
Yup, of course. :-)
>I would like to clarify that debian-desktop (alioth, svn, mailing
>list) is now a unit compo
On 12/20/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
> CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
Right, but we need to make it clear for the users and the first line
of th
Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Unfortunately, even the GNOME desktop environment doesn't fit on the
> CD#1.
True, but enough does fit to have a basically useable gnome desktop.
> You will need broadband connection to fetch some more packages
> or use the full DVD#1 for your architecture. The bonus is th
I hope its not too inappropriate to post this message on this group, I
am not a developer but I subscribed to this group a long time ago just
to keep in touch with what was happening with Debian
I just want to say thank you so much for this fantastic system :
Etch/Testing It works so fine on my
On 12/20/06, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
Gnome vs. KDE vs. XFCE
==
The KDE and XFCE variants of CD#1 are now being produced to give more
choice to people for initial installation. By default, CD#1 has always
meant to be enough to install a fully-functioni
26 matches
Mail list logo
