Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to solve a long-standing bug and finally make TeX aware of
> libpaper and its system-wide paper size setting.
Thanks; I, for one, would greatly appreciate that.
> However, taking the intersection of paper sizes the different program's
> con
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Some argued that every paper which can be fed to a printer on the
>> market might be used as default size on a particular system.
>
> If you'd like to use a different default, how difficult is the
> implementation for the user/administrator of the
On 2008-08-03 18:44, Frank Küster wrote:
> I would like to solve a long-standing bug and finally make TeX aware
> of libpaper and its system-wide paper size setting.
Good!
> However, taking the intersection of paper sizes the different
> program's configuration files accept as default, I end up w
Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 18:44 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Therefore I asked upstream whether they'd be willing to add more paper
>> sizes, and they said they would accept patches. However, they also said
>> that they didn't want to bloat the code with
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 18:44 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Therefore I asked upstream whether they'd be willing to add more paper
> sizes, and they said they would accept patches. However, they also said
> that they didn't want to bloat the code with information about paper
> sizes which no one will
Hi all,
I would like to solve a long-standing bug and finally make TeX aware of
libpaper and its system-wide paper size setting. In a way, upstream's
configuration scripts already provide most of the infrastructure needed.
However, taking the intersection of paper sizes the different program's
con
6 matches
Mail list logo
