I demand that Carlos Sousa may or may not have written...
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600
> "Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC
>> 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message
>> should not have lef
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:41:42PM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600
> "Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC
> > 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message
> > should not ha
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:24:51 -0600
"Joel Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think that declaring something which complies with RFC
> 2821/2822(the core SMTP-based email RFCs) is a good idea. The message
> should not have left the remote server without a qualified domain, but
> this is a bu
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:19:45 +1000
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > >> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other
> > > >> mta's filled in their own name for some reason...
> > > >
> > > > That's the default beh
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 12:19:45PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > >> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other mta's
> > >> filled in their own name for some reason...
> > >
> > > That's the default behavior of all MTA's I'm familiar with.
> >
> > Some MTAs do indeed q
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 11:22:55AM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:19:45 +1000
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > The reason is so the you can type mail and have it end up
> > at the right place. i.e. you don't need to know the mail domain to
> > send a mail to the local user
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 21:19:12 +1000
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > at the right place. i.e. you don't need to know the mail domain to
> > > send a mail to the local user.
> >
> > In that case, the mail message should *never* leave the local
> > domain.
>
> And if the target user has a .forwa
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:19:45 +1000
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > >> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other
> > >> mta's filled in their own name for some reason...
> > >
> > > That's the default behavior of all MTA's I'm familiar with.
> >
> > Some MTAs do indeed qualify
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 01:14:08AM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Martin Waitz writes:
>
> >> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other mta's
> >> filled in their own name for some reason...
> >
> > That's the default behavior of a
Martin Waitz writes:
> i guess antigen didn't specify any @ in From:, and the other mta's filled
> in their own name for some reason...
That's the default behavior of all MTA's I'm familiar with.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:08:50PM +0100, Carlos Sousa wrote:
> This auto-reply email was sent by the University of Missouri, KC, USA.
> How come the "From:" header line says it comes from my ISP's machine (at
> Porto, Portugal)? It sure has nothing to do with me or my ISP.
i received it with a Fr
On 19 Apr 2002 16:44:45 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^
> ...
> You have received a file type that is not allowed to be sent at UMKC.
> ...
> The message was discovered in the folder: SMTP Messages\Inbound
> located at University of Missou
You have received a file type that is not allowed to be sent at UMKC.
This file type is usually associated with email worms and viruses.
The sender can rename the file extension and re-send it if they wish. (i.e.
rename .vbs to .vbtxt)
In a message with the subject of: "Hello,please try again Sc
13 matches
Mail list logo
