Re: Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-25 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Jaldhar" == Jaldhar H Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jaldhar> Not me but I did spend quite a lot of my childhood with Jaldhar> my arm held out rigidly in front of me saying, Jaldhar> "EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!" See, it's the little things that bring us together... -- Stephen

Re: Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-23 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Branden> /me wanders off, laughing maniacally and regressing to > Branden> childhood Saturday nights watching PBS... > > Did you call your dog K-9 and and build a phone booth out

Re: Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-22 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Branden> /me wanders off, laughing maniacally and regressing to Branden> childhood Saturday nights watching PBS... Did you call your dog K-9 and and build a phone booth out of cardboard boxes too? -- Stephen You will be a l

Re: Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-21 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:31:03PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > > Binary packages (excluding those in source packages listed above): > > > wmmoonclock, xaw3dg-dev, xcin2.3, xdigger, xdkcal, xgraph, xsol, > > > > I'm not sure how

Re: Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-21 Thread Branden Robinson
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:03:06PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > As discussed previously, I'll be filing bugs against any source or > binary packages which still depend on the obsolete xlib6g* packages. > These will be normal severity for now, but will be raised to serious > severity (for source

Re: Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-21 Thread Daniel Schepler
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:03:06PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > > Binary packages (excluding those in source packages listed above): > > wmmoonclock, xaw3dg-dev, xcin2.3, xdigger, xdkcal, xgraph, xsol, >

Re: Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-21 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:03:06PM -0800, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Binary packages (excluding those in source packages listed above): > wmmoonclock, xaw3dg-dev, xcin2.3, xdigger, xdkcal, xgraph, xsol, I'm not sure how you gather that

Another mass bug filing: get rid of xlib6g*

2002-11-21 Thread Daniel Schepler
As discussed previously, I'll be filing bugs against any source or binary packages which still depend on the obsolete xlib6g* packages. These will be normal severity for now, but will be raised to serious severity (for source packages) or grave severity (for binary packages) once these packages dis