On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:32:59AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> - - requests by the author of a post for that post not to be published
> - will be honoured;
> + - If the author makes a resonable case that some material is
> + sensitive, then that material is redacted from that post
On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:35:28 +1000, Anthony Towns said:
> (Followups to -vote)
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> The primary reason for this is that the existing messages were sent
>> to debian-private with an expectation of privacy.
> As Matthew pointed out in
My biggest problem with all this is that it's gonna mean a lot of work -
for the 'declassifying team' and for people who want to be bothered
about commenting on the process is respect of particular email. Thats
time that I feel could be better spent.
I do understand the motives...
--
Paul
On Thu
Hi,
Jérôme Marant wrote:
- the list of posts to be declassified will be made available to
developers two weeks before publication, so that the decisions
Two weeks is too short to review, IMO.
I didn't read that as a hard time limit between announcement and
publication, but rather as t
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 12:35 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> (Followups to -vote)
>
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > The primary reason for this is that the existing messages were sent to
> > debian-private with an expectation of privacy.
>
> As Matthew pointed o
(Followups to -vote)
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> The primary reason for this is that the existing messages were sent to
> debian-private with an expectation of privacy.
As Matthew pointed out in [0] this expectation of privacy isn't really
that strong, fundam
Em Qui, 2005-12-01 às 08:32 -0600, Manoj Srivastava escreveu:
> a) The post contained sensitive material.
> In this case, if a reasonable case has been made for the
> material being sensitive, and one that the declassification
> teams accepted, then the material should be
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:56:48PM +, Dave Holland wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > I think the default behaviour should be to keep the post private, not to
> > open it up. That is, if the author and other individuals do not reply,
> > the message is
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 08:30:37AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> I think the default behaviour should be to keep the post private, not to
> open it up. That is, if the author and other individuals do not reply,
> the message is kept hidden.
>
> The primary reason for this is that the existing mes
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 08:32 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
...
> - the author and other individuals quoted in messages being reviewed
> will be contacted, and allowed between four and eight weeks
> to comment;
I think the default behaviour should be to keep the post pri
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
>> What is this supposed to mean? If no comments have been made by the
>> author for eight weeks, messages will be automatically declassified?
>> It looks like a kind of opt out to me.
>
> True. It may be an idea to have
Here are the urls I didn't find for my other post:
http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/nb/nb.cgi/view/vitanuova/2005/03/13/0
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec2000/full_papers/rao/rao.pdf
http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/NewsBruiser-2.6.1/nb.cgi/view/vitanuova/2005/04/06/0
http://en.w
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> a) The post contained sensitive material.
>
> In this case, if a reasonable case has been made for the
> material being sensitive, and one that the declassification
> teams accepted, then the material should be redacted from the
> post, a
On Thursday 01 December 2005 15.32, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> + - If the author indicates he does not wish to be associated with a
> + post, any identifying information is redacted from that post,
> + and any quotes in subsequent posts, but the rest of the material
> + is published.
Hello,
Jérôme Marant wrote:
What is this supposed to mean? If no comments have been made by the
author for eight weeks, messages will be automatically declassified?
It looks like a kind of opt out to me.
True. It may be an idea to have another proposed amendment reversing the
logic, and see
Quoting Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * The team will automatically declassify and publish posts made to
> that list that are three or more years old, with the following
> exceptions:
>
> - the author and other individuals quoted in messages being reviewed
> will be
Hi,
Rationale:
I have been thinking about the kinds of reasons for not
wanting to have a post to -private published. I came up with two
major (reasonable) scenarios:
a) The post contained sensitive material.
In this case, if a reasonable case has been made for the
m
17 matches
Mail list logo
