Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:38:33PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006-10-28 16:16:31 -0400 :
>> > Excellent. Thanks for the hard work. This is not a problem, per
>> > se, but rather a question. I saw that the new Alioth server has
On 10/29/06, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think there's any explicit rationale -- at least, nothing
> beyond "8GB is quite a bit" :-)
I once heard that the way Linux works, it's best to have swap space
anyway; I don't know what the rationale was from a technical
perspecti
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > As a side note: yes, we know SVN isn't reachable through svn://.
> > The SVN server is up, but the relevant port is blocked by the firewall
> > at the hosting facility. The admins have been contacted. In the
> > meantime, use svn+ssh:// if you can
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:38:33PM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006-10-28 16:16:31 -0400 :
> > Excellent. Thanks for the hard work. This is not a problem, per
> > se, but rather a question. I saw that the new Alioth server has 8GB
> > of RAM, but now swap space. I understand
Roberto C. Sanchez, 2006-10-28 16:16:31 -0400 :
> Excellent. Thanks for the hard work. This is not a problem, per
> se, but rather a question. I saw that the new Alioth server has 8GB
> of RAM, but now swap space. I understand that 8GB is quite a bit,
> but I was wondering what the rationale w
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:02:07AM +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Alioth migration and upgrade seems to have worked out mostly okay.
> You are therefore encouraged to test and use the new and improved
> alioth.debian.org, and report problems if you find any.
>
Excellent. Thanks for
6 matches
Mail list logo
