Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Branden Robinson wrote: > Why, God, why? Well.. I wanted to get rid of those annoying priority override messages from dinstall. Of course I overdid it by making all vim packages priority extra: ftpmaster lists vim and vim-ruby as priority optional. I have no idea what made them dec

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 14:32, Joey Hess wrote: > Cause you need an exotic peice of hardware called a "teletype" or "CRT" > or "LCD" to use it, I suppose. Or maybe it's that "qwerty keyboard" > thing. Perhaps it's the "conflicts with something that is standard or higher" rule in action... although I

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: > >* Change priority to extra > > > > > > > > > > > > "CLEAR!" > > > > "AGAIN! CLEAR!" > > > > > > Why, God, why? Cause you need an exotic peice of hardware called a "teletype" or "CRT" or "LCD" to use it, I suppose. Or maybe it's that "qwerty ke

Re: Accepted vim 6.1.165-1 (i386 source)

2002-08-27 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:47:22PM -0400, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > vim (6.1.165-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* Change priority to extra "CLEAR!" "AGAIN! CLEAR!" Why, God, why? -- G. Branden Robinson|I'm sorry if the following sounds Debian GNU/L