Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:15:43AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD patch. >>> Could you please tell me why this is such a huge deal? >> hmm. I'm given to understand that

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:15:43AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD patch. >>> Could you please tell me why this is such a huge deal? >> hmm. I'm given to understand that

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:15:43AM -, Thomas Dickey wrote: >>> Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD >>> patch. >> Could you please tell me why this is such a huge deal? > hmm. I'm given to understand that you don't get annoyed when people > are (to be genero

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:26:09AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: >> Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD >> patch. >> >> After the second time, there is no plausible excuse. >> >> Do you have an excuse? > Could y

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:26:09AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > Martin Schulze has been told more than once that this was not an OpenBSD > patch. > > After the second time, there is no plausible excuse. > > Do you have an excuse? Could you please tell me why this is such a huge deal? /* Steina

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He can fix a previous entry and cite it in next version. Perhaps 4 months is too short a time for him to correct it. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Otavio Salvador
Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:46:56PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: >> Thomas Dickey wrote: >> >> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200 >> [...] >> > After the second time, there is no plausible excuse. >> > Do you have an excuse? >> >> Why do you ask if y

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Dickey wrote: >>> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200 > [...] >> After the second time, there is no plausible excuse. >> Do you have an excuse? > Why do you ask if you know there isn't? > Hint: You could always look at the date of the actual up

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 02:46:56PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Thomas Dickey wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200 > [...] > > After the second time, there is no plausible excuse. > > Do you have an excuse? > > Why do you ask if you know there isn't? Because Martin's actions are m

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Thomas Dickey wrote: >> Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200 [...] > After the second time, there is no plausible excuse. > Do you have an excuse? Why do you ask if you know there isn't? Hint: You could always look at the date of the actual update. Maybe you just file a minor bug, that would hel

Re: Accepted lynx 2.8.5-2sarge2 (source i386)

2006-09-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 08:20:14AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Format: 1.7 > Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 07:47:40 +0200 > Source: lynx > Binary: lynx > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 2.8.5-2sarge2 > Distribution: stable-security > Urgency: hi