Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> The generated, new symbols file looks something like:
>
> Why exactly is this file "generated", and how? Symbols files don't work
> very well if they aren't being deliberately maintained; it would be much
>
+ Steve Langasek (Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:13:57 -0700):
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I’m unsure why assigning VERS_1 to all symbols works for preserving
> > compatibility, whereas old binaries use symbols not associated with any
> > version node (i.e., @Base). M
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 06:43:00PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > The generated, new symbols file looks something like:
Why exactly is this file "generated", and how? Symbols files don't work
very well if they aren't being deliberately maintained; it would be much
simpler to just use shlibs in t
+ Michael Biebl (Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:40:23 +0200):
> [not sure if debian-mentors is the right list, but I try anyway]
[I’m moving to -devel in search of a wider audience, and dropping
-mentors via Bcc to avoid the crosspost. Hopefully interested -mentor
readers can move to -devel without much inc
4 matches
Mail list logo
