On 25/09/23 14:29, Wookey wrote:
It's actually quite well-maintained, just not by the maintainer:
someone else has uploaded the last 3 upstream versions via
debian-mentors.
I think this example shows the need for a level of maintainership that
sits between "fully maintained" and "orphaned". (O
On 2023-09-23 08:35 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> On 22/09/23 09:41, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > I doubt simple rules will really work out, rules like that
> > one I had in mind "Packages are removed from testing once they have been
> > orphaned/last maintainer-uploaded more than five years ago".
On 22/09/23 09:41, Christoph Biedl wrote:
I doubt simple rules will really work out, rules like that
one I had in mind "Packages are removed from testing once they have been
orphaned/last maintainer-uploaded more than five years ago".
Maybe something more nuanced may work.
For example: package
3 matches
Mail list logo
