On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 01:19:10PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a
RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other
choices. Then I would have considered much more knowledgeable your
opini
On 06/06/2021 11:43, Aaron Dewes wrote:
I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
way supported by a Debian Developer
I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
or is there a build script to verify the images)?
Does the RPi4 is totally
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 12:43:53 +0200, Aaron Dewes
wrote:
>> I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
>> way supported by a Debian Developer
>
>I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
>or is there a build script to verify the images)?
Guido h
Marc Haber wrote...
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:50:20 +0200, Christoph Biedl
> wrote:
> >For me, the biggest downside of the RPi4 is the need for an extra power
> >plug as they take up to three amps - while for example a BananaPi can be
> >powered using some unused USB (<= 3.0) port.
>
> Mine run vi
On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 12:43 +0200, Aaron Dewes wrote:
> > I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in
> > a
> > way supported by a Debian Developer
>
> I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built
> (Manually,
> or is there a build script to verify the images)
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 12:43:53PM +0200, Aaron Dewes wrote:
> > I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
> > way supported by a Debian Developer
>
> I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
> or is there a build script to verify the images
I personally prefer the Raspi 4 because it can run plain Debian in a
way supported by a Debian Developer
I'm interested in this version, do you know how it is built (Manually,
or is there a build script to verify the images)?
Does the RPi4 is totally 64 bit ?
It can run plain Debian arm64. Is
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 05:44:21 +, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Marc Haber wrote:
>
>> I haven't advanced to package cross-building yet.
>
>Some resources related to that:
>
>http://crossqa.debian.net/
>https://wiki.debian.org/CrossCompiling
Thanks!
Greetings
Marc
--
---
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 13:19:10 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
>I think you didn't get much what I said...
Probably.
>If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a
>RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other
>choices. Then I would
Hello, hope this works, am not normally subscribed to debian-devel
> If you'd have took time to explain the real reason behind why choosing a
> RPi4 maybe a good idea versus simply saying they are better than other
> choices. Then I would have considered much more knowledgeable your
> opinions and
On Sb, 05 iun 21, 19:01:36, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:04:45PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> > The PINE A64+ (2 GB RAM) is very stable for me, unless I put significant
> > load on the USB connection (specifically *heavy* writing to an external
> > HDD in a powered enclo
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:28 PM Marc Haber wrote:
> I haven't advanced to package cross-building yet.
Some resources related to that:
http://crossqa.debian.net/
https://wiki.debian.org/CrossCompiling
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 01:19:10PM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Does the RPi4 is totally 64 bit ?
Does using arm64 (as described on https://wiki.debian.org/RaspberryPi and
https://raspi.debian.net/) count or are you asking about something on top
of that?
--
WBR, wRAR
signatur
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 1:01 p.m., Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:04:45PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> Any of the boards from pine64.org should do and as far as I know have
>> quite good support (i.e. there are Debian Installer images for them) and
>> all are 64 bit ;)
>
> +1 to
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 12:24 p.m., Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:39:08 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> I always appreciate all opinions. But what I surely dislike is people
>> that put others option down to raiser their own.
>
> If that was targeted at me, duly noted. I
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 03:04:45PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Any of the boards from pine64.org should do and as far as I know have
> quite good support (i.e. there are Debian Installer images for them) and
> all are 64 bit ;)
+1 to pine64 gear.
> The PINE A64+ (2 GB RAM) is very stable for
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 10:50:20 +0200, Christoph Biedl
wrote:
>Marc Haber wrote...
>> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
>> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box even if one doesn't
>> need/use the GPU after booting, but it is reasonably common that
>> peop
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:39:08 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
>I always appreciate all opinions. But what I surely dislike is people
>that put others option down to raiser their own.
If that was targeted at me, duly noted. I will refrain from spending
time with your requests in the fu
On 2021-06-05 15:04:45 +0300 (+0300), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> For a cheap board now I'd probably go for a ROCK64 (USB3 instead
> of USB2), or even a RockPro64 (better CPU, PCIe, unfortunately
> limited to 4 GB RAM).
>
> Heating could also be an issue under load, so you should consider
> gett
On Sb, 05 iun 21, 01:16:44, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't reall
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 07:33:20AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-06-05 4:50 a.m., Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Marc Haber wrote...
> >
> >> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
> >> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box ev
Quoting Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (2021-06-05 13:33:20)
> I saw a board on AliExpress that offer some AllWonder A33 with 1 or
> 2Gb RAM for a really good price.
Since you asked on a Debian mailinglist, beware that not all ARM boards
sold on AliBaba is supported in Debian.
Also, company is
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 4:50 a.m., Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Marc Haber wrote...
>
>> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
>> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box even if one doesn't
>> need/use the GPU after booting, but it is reasonably common that
>> people
On 05/06/2021 09:46, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 04:39:08AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
I do agree that the Raspberry is able to run up to 4 Gb, but there's
other board too.
(to 8 actually)
Yes I agree on 8, the Raspberry pi 400 is still 4gb though,
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 11:22:46AM +0530, Siji Sunny wrote:
> > Hi !
> > I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> > Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
> >
> > I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> > I don't r
Marc Haber wrote...
> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box even if one doesn't
> need/use the GPU after booting, but it is reasonably common that
> people care about their software on the platform, and it's also
> a
On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 04:39:08AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
> I do agree that the Raspberry is able to run up to 4 Gb, but there's
> other board too.
(to 8 actually)
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 4:08 a.m., Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 01:16:44 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
>> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>>
>> I know about the Raspberry PI
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 8:08 AM Marc Haber wrote:
> I'd still consider the Raspberry Pi. It's unfortunate that the binary
> non-free blob is already needed to boot the box
There is a free replacement for the binary non-free blob here:
https://github.com/librerpi/rpi-open-firmware/
Unfortunately
Quoting Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (2021-06-05 07:16:44)
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't really nee
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 01:16:44 -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
>I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
>Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
>I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
>I don't really ne
Hi,
On 2021-06-05 1:52 a.m., Siji Sunny wrote:
>
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't r
> Hi !
> I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
> Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
>
> I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
> I don't really need a GPU, if I do need graphics then I could always go
> with a
Hi !
I'm looking for a ARM platform that can easily run Linux.
Support using terminal over serial port for booting (no need of a GPU).
I know about the Raspberry PI but the GPU drivers are not open source.
I don't really need a GPU, if I do need graphics then I could always go
with a X over Ethern
34 matches
Mail list logo
