On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:36:39AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
> > submitter?
>
> I believe
>
> submitter [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> works just fine.
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
> submitter?
I believe
submitter [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
works just fine.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you do immediately lower the severity of a bug I raised the severity
> of again, could you please at least put my in the Cc header of the
> message you send to the BTS?
No, that's not a requirement. If you want to receive notifications,
you should a
On 5/4/05, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > >grave <-> serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
> > >difference between them (both are RC)
> >
> > You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >grave <-> serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
> >difference between them (both are RC)
>
> You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities then? Severities
> are there to inform the dev
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:01:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Mark Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050504 16:00]:
> > Not entirely the answer you're looking for, but submit a duplicate bug
> > and merge it.
> No, don't do that.
It's ugly as hell and may well annoy the maintainer by creating nois
* Mark Brown ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050504 16:00]:
> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:33:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > I didn't know a bug can have more than one submitter.
>
> > What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
> > submitter?
> Not entirely the answer you
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:33:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I didn't know a bug can have more than one submitter.
> What's the syntax for the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for adding a second
> submitter?
Not entirely the answer you're looking for, but submit a duplicate bug
and merge it.
--
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:24:34AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to
> > adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly
> > reported as non-RC, and neither yo
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:40:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>...
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
> > it, it would be nice if you would:
> > - Cc me
> > - send a better explanation than
severity 306015 important
quit
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
> it, it would be nice if you would:
> - Cc me
> - send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh"
If you a
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>grave <-> serious isn't worth a discussion since there's not a big
>difference between them (both are RC)
>
>
You are 100% wrong here. Why do we have bug severities then? Severities
are there to inform the developer and the rest of the Debian world about
the seriousness of
Richard Atterer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> Looking at the bug log, it seems that you had no business increasing
>> the severity in the first place. You didn't report the bug, you
> [...]
>
> So now just people who are affe
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You seem to confuse this with bug closing. It's common practice to
> adjust the severity of a bug to a RC one if a RC issue was mistakenly
> reported as non-RC, and neither your Developers Reference nor your
> release team have ever disagreed with this
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Looking at the bug log, it seems that you had no business increasing
> the severity in the first place. You didn't report the bug, you
[...]
So now just people who are affected by bugs are allowed to report them?
And it's als
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:30:22AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > severity 306015 grave
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
> > it, it would be nice if you would:
> > - Cc me
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> severity 306015 grave
> thanks
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
> it, it would be nice if you would:
> - Cc me
> - send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh"
Looking at t
severity 306015 grave
thanks
Hi Steve,
first of all, if you downgrade a bug only a good hour after I upgraded
it, it would be nice if you would:
- Cc me
- send a better explanation than "This is not a missing dependency, feh"
I know that downgrading RC bugs makes your RC bugs metric look better
18 matches
Mail list logo
