On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 11:41:02AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Not only you, Jerome and me were suggesting it in the past. However I am
> afraid that the whole package movement machinery would have to be
> rewritten to allow independent handling of the version in different
> "testing" threes, plus
#include
* Björn Stenberg [Thu, May 15 2003, 01:18:57AM]:
> Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > So let me make the following modest strawman proposal. Let us posit
> > the existence of a new distribution, which for now I'll name
> > "testing-x86".
>
> I suggested the same thing a few weeks ago, with little
Hi, Sven Luther wrote:
> [...] and gave the impression that testing was more
> stable/secure/preferable/whatever to unstable [...]
That was my first impression too.
> I don't say that what you say is wrong, just that people are not aware
> of it, because we did tell them differently back then.
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 10:51:42AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:14:20 -0400, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > If that's the case, then maybe the testing distribution has outlived
> > its usefulness. But if people feel otherwise, then it would make
> > sens
Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> So let me make the following modest strawman proposal. Let us posit
> the existence of a new distribution, which for now I'll name
> "testing-x86".
I suggested the same thing a few weeks ago, with little reaction. Nice to see
someone else got the same idea.
I'd volunteer t
On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:14:20 -0400, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If that's the case, then maybe the testing distribution has outlived
> its usefulness. But if people feel otherwise, then it would make
> sense to think of ways in which testing might be able to be more
> true to its o
On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 09:14, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I've solved the problem for myself by just simply biting the bullet
> and using unstable. I either have gotten lucky, or maintainers of
> core packages have gotten much more careful about testing their
> packages before uploading, so I haven't g
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 02:22:05PM +0300, Chris Leishman wrote:
> I care about security in testing, and I believe others do too. But I
> don't think the process should be the same as with stable releases.
> Testing should not become another psudo stable distributionit's for
> testing. So
8 matches
Mail list logo
