Martin Zobel-Helas dijo [Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:18:18PM +0100]:
> a more theoretical question quite related to this:
>
> If one plans to have the key replaced in the keyring, and we have a
> fellow DD in the keyring who's only trust path to other Debian
> Developers goes via that key (this might
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 09:18:18PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> a more theoretical question quite related to this:
>
> If one plans to have the key replaced in the keyring, and we have a
> fellow DD in the keyring who's only trust path to other Debian
> Developers goes via that key (this mig
On Mon, January 31, 2011 21:18, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> a more theoretical question quite related to this:
>
> If one plans to have the key replaced in the keyring, and we have a
> fellow DD in the keyring who's only trust path to other Debian
> Developers goes via that key (this might become a
Hi,
a more theoretical question quite related to this:
If one plans to have the key replaced in the keyring, and we have a
fellow DD in the keyring who's only trust path to other Debian
Developers goes via that key (this might become a real scenario when we
do a bigger round of key replacements)
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:49:26PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> If you are signing keys where you've verified the identity of fellow
> Debian developers at a key signing party, please do us all a favor and
> don't just sign it with your brand-new key --- but *also* sign the DD's
> key with whateve
At the most recent Linux.conf.au pgp keysigning, I noticed a number of
Debian developers present. Like me, they had new keys that they offered
up for signing, presumably so they could start replacing their 1024DSA
keys with stronger keys.
If you are signing keys where you've verified the identity
6 matches
Mail list logo
