On 2016-10-06, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Then I would like to ask when we must think that we need a transition f=
> or a=20
> the package. If these test shows a binary compatibility of 99%, do we n=
> eed to=20
> create a need soname bump and initiate a transition?=20
Always use common s
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> Then I would like to ask when we must think that we need a transition for a
> the package. If these test shows a binary compatibility of 99%, do we need to
> create a need soname bump and initiate a transition?
SONAMEs are genera
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:59 PM, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> how are they related to the dpkg-gensymbols?
The exported symbols of a library are part of the ABI but the purpose
of the two tools is completely different.
> Would it make sense to use the symbol files with it or have it as an
> altern
On 2016-10-06, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
> The tools are based on different software stacks.
> The pkg-abidiff is based on ABI Compliance Checker and ABI Dumper tools
> (https://github.com/lvc)
> developed since 2009.
The ABI compliance checker is the only tool that I have tried that
actually w
06.10.2016, 15:32, "Ponomarenko Andrey":
> 06.10.2016, 07:54, "Paul Wise":
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software libraries
>>> — Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdiff). It's a tool for backward
>>> co
El Dijous, 6 d'octubre de 2016, a les 15:23:10, Ponomarenko Andrey va
escriure:
> 06.10.2016, 07:54, "Paul Wise" :
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
> >> I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software
> >> libraries — Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdif
Hi Andrey,
how are they related to the dpkg-gensymbols?
Would it make sense to use the symbol files with it or have it as an
alternative to dpkg-gensymbols?
* Ponomarenko Andrey [2016-10-06 15:23]:
> Anyway, it's better to run both tools on all packages at the same time and
> verify reports of
06.10.2016, 07:54, "Paul Wise" :
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
>
>> I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software libraries —
>> Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdiff). It's a tool for backward compatibility
>> analysis of API/ABI interfaces in Deb
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Ponomarenko Andrey wrote:
> I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software libraries —
> Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdiff). It's a tool for backward compatibility
> analysis of API/ABI interfaces in Deb packages. The tool is based on ABI
> Com
Hello,
I'd like to present a new free tool for maintainers of software libraries —
Package ABI Diff Tool (Pkg-ABIdiff). It's a tool for backward compatibility
analysis of API/ABI interfaces in Deb packages. The tool is based on ABI
Compliance Checker and ABI Dumper tools.
The tool does the fol
10 matches
Mail list logo
